No abstract

One of the most salient developments in recent short story criticism focuses on the genre’s connection with liminality. Both short fiction’s suitability to convey the liminal and liminality as a defining feature of the short story are at stake. The short fiction of contemporary author Janice Galloway is a good example of this. After a brief introduction to the concept of liminality, I discuss one story from each of Galloway’s collections of short fiction: “Frostbite” is the story of how a young music student crosses an existential boundary and leaves behind disabling expectations and fears; “jellyfish” features a divorced woman undergoing a liminal moment in her experience of motherhood, whereas the woman in a homeless couple in “a night in” narrates her experience as a privileged witness to ontological liminality affecting both space and language.

Jacques Lacan conceives of the voice as more than meets the ear: that is, as an objet a that must be subtracted from the acoustic field to preserve the coherence of reality as a symbolically constructed order in which subjects are inserted and from which they derive a sense of identity. Disruptive manifestations of the object voice are frequent in the modernist and postmodernist British short story, a form which, on account of its brevity and limited scope, renders more sharply the traumatic nature of such episodes, which thus become more memorable and engaging for readers. The short story, likewise, is an apt vehicle for postcolonial and diasporic subjectivities characterized by the tensions and psychic distress provoked by their liminal location between different cultures and their heterogenous and often conflicting interpellations. After an introductory part which elaborates on the interrelations between object voice, the short story genre and the postcolonial subject, this article examines two recent stories by Koye Oyedeji (‘Postscript from the Black Atlantic’) and Diriye Osman (‘Earthling’), in which existential conflicts become so acute that they trigger aural hallucinations, which determine the central characters’ predicament in the context of the migrant diaspora in Britain.

No abstract

This article elaborates on the structural, thematic and characterological similarities between Alan Parker’s Pink Floyd: The Wall and Homer’s Iliad, reading both works as epics that revolve around the hero’s wrath, its consequences and its resolution. The argument is organised around three central topics: loss as the cause of the heroes’ inaction and suffering inflicted by an inhumane power in the context of the war; law as the foundation of a social order that redresses the balance; love as the binding force of individual and collective harmony. After introducing the central thesis and objectives, the article redresses the balance concerning Achilles status as the example of virile might by highlighting its more human and humane dimension, the truly dominant theme of the Iliad an which comes closer to modern sensibility. Both the Iliad and Pink Floyd: The Wall feature two heroic figures that embark on a journey of self-discovery that not only entails the transformation of their subjective position inside society, but also the articulation of a set of values alternative to those that operate in their respective social formations. In developing this in the remaining sections, the article does not lose sight of the specificities of the different historical periods in which both narratives are embedded and respond to. The research carried out here takes Homer’s text more as a point of comparative reference for the film than as the object of creative reception.