The presence of occult CNS involvement at diagnosis in patients with NHL at high risk of CNS disease is associated with a higher probability of CNS relapse.
Flow cytometric DNA analysis on fine needle aspiration biopsies of liver lesions The DNA cell content of 39 fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNAs) from five benign liver lesions, nine hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 25 metastatic tumours was analysed in a prospective fashion by flow cytometry (FCM). All benign lesions were diploid. Aneuploidy was found in five (55.6%) HCCs and in nine (36%) metastatic tumours. DNA index (DI) differences were not significant. The S-phase fraction (SPF) was higher in the malignant tumours, both combined (P < 0.02) and separated primary and metastatic (P < 0.05). We could not demonstrate an association between diploidy and percentage of benign hepatocytes in the smears of malignant tumours. The serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level did not correlate with ploidy, DI, or SPF in the HCCs. In conclusion, ploidy and DI do not discriminate between benign and malignant liver lesions, but the SPF is higher in malignant tumours. DNA analysis does not help to distinguish primary from metastatic liver tumours. The presence of benign hepatocytes in samples from malignant tumours does not seem to influence the analysis of ploidy by FCM.
Background and objective. Several studies have demonstrated that flow cytometry (FCM) improves the sensitivity of conventional cytology (CC) for the identification of leptomeningeal disease in aggressive lymphomas with high risk of central nervous system (CNS) involvement. A previous report from our group showed infiltration by FCM study in 27 out of 123 (22%) newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphomas, while CC was positive in only 7 (6%). However, the clinical significance of the occult disease in CNS (FCM positive and CC negative) remains unknown. Patients and Methods. At the time of the analysis, 68 out of 123 patients of the previous study had adequate follow-up (median of follow-up for the alive patients [n=42] of 18 months [range 12–30]). In this cohort of patients the CNS involvement during follow-up was assessed according to CC and FCM results in cerebrospinal fluid at the time of diagnosis. Results. Three groups were defined according to the results of CC and CFM: Group 1, patients without CNS involvement (CC and FCM negatives, n=49); Group 2, patients with occult CNS disease (FCM positive and CC negative, n=11); Group 3, patients with CNS disease (CC and FCM positive, n=8). The groups were comparable for the main clinical and biological characteristics and histological subtypes of NHL. In the Group 1, 40 patients received intrathecal (IT) prophylaxis, 2 received CNS therapy due to the presence neurological symptoms and 7 did not receive any prophylaxis. In the Group 2, CNS prophylaxis was administered to 7 patients, whereas the 4 remaining received active therapy. The 8 patients of the Group 3 received active CNS therapy. Overall, 6 patients showed CNS relapse/progression, 2 in the Group 1 (4.1%) (both with diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) and 4 in the Group 3 (50%) (3 with Burkitt’s lymphoma and the remaining with DLBCL). None of the patients of the Group 2 showed CNS relapse or progression during follow-up. As expected, patients of Group 3 showed a significant increase in CNS relapse compared to those from Groups 1 (p<0.001) and 2 (p=0.038). However, the incidence of CNS relapse in patients of Groups 1 and 2 was not statistically different (p=0.496). Conclusions. Up to now, and different from previous studies, the presence of occult CNS disease in our cohort of patients with NHL and high risk of CNS disease was not associated with a higher risk of CNS relapse. This feature could be due to the fact that most of the patients received adequate CNS prophylaxis, that could be sufficient to eliminate the occult disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.