The study strengthened the notion that effective control of STD/AIDS depends on a synergic approach that combines interventions on individual (biological-behavioral), sociocultural and programmatic levels.
We concluded that information on many of the essential items required for a correct interpretation of the anatomopathologic examination was missing from the request forms.
BackgroundUrethral discharge syndrome (UDS) is characterized by the presence of
purulent or mucopurulent urethral discharge.The main etiological agents of
this syndrome are Neisseria gonorrhoeae and
Chlamydia trachomatis.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of the syndromic management to resolve symptoms
in male urethral discharge syndrome cases in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.MethodsRetrospective cohort of male cases of urethral discharge syndrome observed at
a clinic for sexually transmitted disease (STD) in 2013. Epidemiological and
clinical data, as well as the results of urethral swabs, bacterioscopy,
hybrid capture for C.trachomatis, wet-mount examination,
and culture for N.gonorrhoeae, were obtained through
medical chart reviews.ResultsOf the 800 urethral discharge syndrome cases observed at the STD clinic, 785
(98.1%) presented only urethral discharge syndrome, 633 (79.1%) returned for
follow-up, 579 (91.5%) were considered clinically cured on the first visit,
41(6.5 %) were considered cured on the second visit, and 13(2.0%) did not
reach clinical cure after two appointments. Regarding the etiological
diagnosis, 42.7% of the patients presented a microbiological diagnosis of
N.gonorrhoeae, 39.3% of non-gonococcal and
non-chlamydia urethritis, 10.7% of C.trachomatis and 7.3%
of co-infection with chlamydia and gonococcus. The odds of being considered
cured in the first visit were greater in those who were unmarried, with
greater schooling, and with an etiological diagnosis of gonorrhea. The
diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis reduced the chance of cure in the
first visit.Study limitationA study conducted at a single center of STD treatment.ConclusionSyndromic management of male urethral discharge syndrome performed in
accordance with the Brazilian Ministry of Health STD guidelines was
effective in resolving symptoms in the studied population. More studies with
microbiological outcomes are needed to ensure the maintenance of the
syndromic management.
Background
Sexually transmitted infections (STI) are a global public health problem. Urethritis are among the most common STIs, and can cause several complications and facilitate the transmission of the HIV virus.
Objectives
To investigate the main etiologic agents of urethritis in 170 men treated at Fundação Alfredo da Matta.
Methods
To identify the agents, urethral exudate and urine were collected. Gram and culture tests were performed in Thayer-Martin medium for
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
and polymerase chain reaction for
Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium,
and herpes simplex types 1 and 2.
Results
N. gonorrhoeae
were identified in 102 (60.0%) patients,
C. trachomatis
in 50 (29.4%),
U. urealyticum
in 29 (17.0%),
M. genitalium
in 11 (6.5 %),
U. parvum
in ten (5.9%), and
M. hominis
in seven (4.1%). Herpes simplex type 2 was diagnosed in 24 (21.6%) of the 111 patients who underwent PCR for this pathogen. In 69 cases there was co-infection; the most frequent were:
N. gonorrhoeae
and
C. trachomatis
in 21 (14.7%) patients;
N. gonorrhoeae
and
C. trachomatis
in 21 (12.4%) patients;
N. gonorrhoeae
and herpes simplex type 2 in 11 (6.5%), and
N. gonorrhoeae
and
U. urealyticum
in nine (5.3%).
Study limitations
Not relevant.
Conclusion
N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum
, and herpes simplex type 2 were the pathogens most frequently identified in the present study. The main coinfection found was
N. gonorrhoeae
and
C. trachomatis
.
T. vaginalis
and herpes simplex type 1 were not identified in any of the patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.