Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a troublesome weed that can emerge throughout the soybean growing season in Nebraska and several other regions of the United States. Late- emerging Palmer amaranth plants can produce seeds, thus replenishing the soil seedbank. The objectives of this study were to evaluate single or sequential applications of labeled POST herbicides such as acifluorfen, dicamba, fomesafen/fluthiacet-methyl premix, glyphosate, and lactofen on GR Palmer amaranth control, density, biomass, seed production, and seed viability as well as grain yield of dicamba/glyphosate-resistant (DGR) soybean. Field experiments were conducted in a grower’s field infested with GR Palmer amaranth near Carleton, NE, in 2018 and 2019 with no PRE herbicide applied. Acifluorfen, dicamba, a premix of fomesafen/fluthiacet-methyl, glyphosate, or lactofen were applied POST in single or sequential applications between V4 and R6 soybean growth stages (SGS) with timings based on product labels. Dicamba applied at V4 or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 controlled GR Palmer amaranth 91% to 100% at soybean harvest, reduced Palmer amaranth density to as low as ≤ 2 plants m–2, reduced seed production to 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant, and resulted in the highest soybean yield during both years of the study. Sequential applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen/fluthiacet premix, or lactofen were not as effective as dicamba for GR Palmer amaranth control; however, they reduced seed production similar to dicamba. Results of this study conclude that dicamba was effective for controlling GR Palmer amaranth and reduced density, biomass, and seed production without DGR soybean injury. Herbicides evaluated in this study had no effect on Palmer amaranth seed viability.

Velvetleaf is an economically important weed in agronomic crops in Nebraska and the United States. Dicamba applied alone usually does not provide complete velvetleaf control, particularly when velvetleaf is greater than 15 cm tall. The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the interaction of dicamba, fluthiacet-methyl, and glyphosate applied alone or in a mixture in two- or three-way combinations for velvetleaf control in dicamba/glyphosate-resistant (DGR) soybean and to evaluate whether velvetleaf height (≤ 12 cm or ≤ 20 cm) at the time of herbicide application influences herbicide efficacy, velvetleaf density, biomass, and soybean yield. Field experiments were conducted near Clay Center, Nebraska in 2019 and 2020. The experiment was arranged in a split-plot with velvetleaf height (≤ 12 cm or ≤ 20 cm) as the main plot treatment and herbicides as sub-plot treatment. Fluthiacet provided ≥ 94% velvetleaf control 28 d after treatment (DAT) and ≥ 96% biomass reduction regardless of application rate or velvetleaf height. Velvetleaf control was 31% to 74% at 28 DAT when dicamba or glyphosate was applied alone to velvetleaf ≤ 20 cm tall compared with 47% to 100% control applied to ≤ 12 cm tall plants. Dicamba applied alone to ≤ 20 cm tall velvetleaf provided < 75% control and < 87% biomass reduction 28 DAT compared with ≥ 90% control with dicamba at 560 g ae ha−1 + fluthiacet at 7.2 g ai ha−1 or glyphosate at 1,260 g ae ha−1. Dicmaba at 280 g ae ha−1 + glyphosate at 630 g ae ha−1 applied to ≤ 20 cm tall velvetleaf resulted in 86% control 28 DAT compared with the expected 99% control. The interaction of dicamba + fluthiacet + glyphosate was additive for velvetleaf control and biomass reduction regardless of application rate and velvetleaf height.

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) is one of the most difficult to control weeds in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production fields. Residual pre-emergence (PRE) herbicide applied at planting is one of the recommendations for management of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth; however, information is not available about the effect of residual herbicides on critical time of Palmer amaranth removal (CTPAR) to prevent an unacceptable yield loss in soybean. The objective of this study was to determine the CTPAR in soybean affected by residual PRE herbicides compared with the no PRE herbicide in southcentral Nebraska. Field experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 in a grower's field infested with GR Palmer amaranth near Carleton, NE. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with PRE herbicides (no PRE herbicide, flumioxazin, and a premix of flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone) as the main plot and Palmer amaranth removal timings as subplot treatments (a weed-free control; a nontreated control; and Palmer amaranth removal timing at the V1, V3, V6, R2, and R5 soybean growth stages). In the absence of a PRE herbicide, the CTPAR at 5% soybean yield loss occurred at V1 and V6 soybean growth stages, equivalent to 194 and 480 Celsius growing degrees days (GDDc) in 2018 and 2019, respectively. When flumioxazin was applied alone, the CTPAR was delayed until the V3 and V6 soybean growth stages, or 341 and 501 GDDc. When flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone premix was applied, the CTPAR was delayed until the V2 and R1 soybean growth stages, corresponding to

The dicamba and glyphosate (DpG) tank mixture has been widely adopted for broad-spectrum weed control. However, recent studies indicated antagonistic interactions between these herbicides. Furthermore, little is known about the effect of non-ammonium sulfate water conditioner (non-AMS WC) adjuvant on the activity of DpG tank mixture. Thus, the present study was elaborated to evaluate (1) the interaction of DpG tank mixtures combinations on barnyard grass, and glyphosate-susceptible (GS) and -resistant (GR) horseweed control, and (2) the effect of non-ammonium sulfate water conditioner (non-AMS WC) on the interaction of those two herbicides on the aforementioned weed species. Greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2020 at the Pesticide Application Laboratory in North Platte, NE. Herbicide treatments were arranged in a two-level factorial design of six dicamba rates by six glyphosate rates for Study 1, and in a three-level factorial design of two adjuvant treatments (presence or not of non-AMS WC) by four dicamba rates by four glyphosate rates for Study 2. Both trials were conducted as randomized complete block designs with four replications and two runs. Antagonistic interactions were observed throughout DpG treatments in GS and GR horseweed. For instance, dicamba (560 g ae ha−1) and glyphosate (1260 g ae ha−1) resulted in 72% of GR horseweed biomass reduction, compared to 81% of estimated biomass reduction. For barnyard grass, antagonistic interactions were only observed within the reduced glyphosate rates. The addition of non-AMS WC had no effect on DpG antagonism. However, it improved the barnyard-grass control of glyphosate.