Background. The efficacy of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC‐Ag) in laryngeal cancer to predict those patients who will relapse after primary treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and its utility to detect relapses early and thereby increase salvage rates and cure were assesed.
Methods. Sixty healthy donors and 168 patients with laryngeal cancer were included in this prospective trial. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was measured at diagnosis in all patients, 24 hours and 1 week after surgery in 113 patients and every 10 Gy of administered dose and 2 weeks after treatment in 49 patients primarily referred to radiotherapy. The marker was determined every 3‐6 months during follow‐up. All patients who relapsed had SCC‐Ag studies before and after salvage treatment.
Results. The selected cut‐off value was 1.5 ngr/ml (mean value in control group, 0.65 4+ 2 standard deviation [0.38]). Seventy‐eight percent of patients with cancer had elevated SCC‐Ag values at diagnosis. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was statistically related to TNM categories (T, P < 0.04; N, P < 0.05; Stage, P < 0.01). Seventy‐five percent of those patients with previously elevated pretreatment values normalized after treatment. Incomplete surgical resection (P < 0.0001) or persistence of the disease after radiotherapy (P < 0.01) were related to high posttreatment values. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was elevated in 88% of the patients who relapsed. In 55% of the recurrences, SCC‐Ag was elevated 3 months before pathologic confirmation of relapse. Salvage by surgery or radiotherapy was effective in 70% of the patients. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen posttreatment values were the most important factor in predicting disease free survival (DFS) (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (P < 0.03).
Conclusions. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen is an excellent marker of residual disease after primary treatment that can lead to the addition of other therapeutic procedures (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy). The absence of posttreatment SCC‐Ag is the best predictor of DFS, its presence detects recurrence in early stages, permitting salvage of an increased proportion of patients primarily referred for palliative treatment.
Advanced head and neck (H&N) tumors have a poor prognosis, and this is worsened by the occurrence of hypoxia and ischemia in the tumors. Ozonetherapy has proved useful in the treatment of ischemic syndromes, and several studies have described a potential increase of oxygenation in tissues and tumors. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical effect of ozonetherapy in patients with advanced H&N cancer in the course of their scheduled radiotherapy. Over a period of 3 years, 19 patients with advanced H&N tumors who were undergoing treatment in our department with non-standard fractionated radiotherapy plus oral tegafur. A group of 12 patients was additionally treated with intravenous chemotherapy before and/or during radiotherapy. In the other group of seven patients, systemic ozonetherapy was administered twice weekly during radiotherapy. The ozonetherapy group was older (64 versus 54 years old, P = 0.006), with a higher percentage of lymph node involvement (71% versus 8%, P = 0.019) and with a trend to more unfavorable tumor stage (57% versus 8% IVb + IVc stages, P = 0.073). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the chemotherapy (median 6 months) and ozonetherapy (8 months) groups. Although these results have to be viewed with caution because of the limited number of patients, they suggest that ozonetherapy could have had some positive effect during the treatment of our patients with advanced H&N tumors. The adjuvant administration of ozonetherapy during the chemo–radiotherapy for these tumors merits further research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.