Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are associated with an increased risk of occurrence of cancers of the lip or oral cavity. This paper presents an updated report on the nomenclature and the classification of OPMDs, based predominantly on their clinical features, following discussions by an expert group at a workshop held by the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer in the UK. The first workshop held in London in 2005 considered a wide spectrum of disorders under the term "potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa" (PMD) (now referred to as oral potentially malignant disorders: OPMD) including leukoplakia, erythroplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, oral lichen planus, oral submucous fibrosis, palatal lesions in reverse smokers, lupus erythematosus, epidermolysis bullosa, and dyskeratosis congenita. Any new evidence published in the intervening Medical Sciences,
These findings differ from those observed in other odontogenic lesions, such as ameloblastic fibroma, odontogenic myxoma, odontogenic fibroma, and hyperplastic dental follicles. The term primordial odontogenic tumour is proposed to describe this novel lesion.
There is currently increasing concern about the relation between microbial infections and cancer. More and more studies support the view that there is an association, above all, when the causal agents are bacteria or viruses. This review adds to this, summarizing evidence that the opportunistic fungus Candida albicans increases the risk of carcinogenesis and metastasis. Until recent years, Candida spp. had fundamentally been linked to cancerous processes as it is an opportunist pathogen that takes advantage of the immunosuppressed state of patients particularly due to chemotherapy. In contrast, the most recent findings demonstrate that C. albicans is capable of promoting cancer by several mechanisms, as described in the review: production of carcinogenic byproducts, triggering of inflammation, induction of Th17 response and molecular mimicry. We underline the need not only to control this type of infection during cancer treatment, especially given the major role of this yeast species in nosocomial infections, but also to find new therapeutic approaches to avoid the pro-tumor effect of this fungal species.
Oral leukoplakia (OL) is the most frequently encountered and emblematic oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD). Since its first description, OL has received multiple definitions and it is customarily described as "a white plaque with a questionable risk of cancer that can only be diagnosed once other specific conditions have been ruled out" (Reibel et al., 2017;Warnakulasuriya et al., 2007). Classically, OL is more common among adult males consuming tobacco and/or alcohol, or betel quid, with or without tobacco (particularly among Asian populations) and it encompasses two clinical subtypes, homogeneous oral leukoplakia (HOL) and non-homogeneous oral leukoplakia (NHOL) (van der Waal, 2019;Warnakulasuriya et al., 2020).The most important biological element of OL has to do with its malignant potential. The malignant transformation (MT) proportions in reported studies are highly variable (0.13%-34.0%) (Warnakulasuriya & Ariyawardana, 2016). Unfortunately, to date there are no pathognomonic factors or specific data that enable us to accurately predict which OLs from a cohort may suffer malignant transformation (Diz et al., 2011;van der Waal, 2014).
A systematic review carried out by Warnakulasuriya &Ariyawardana in 2016 reported that advance age, female gender,
Candida albicans isolated from potentially carcinogenic oral diseases can produce mutagenic amounts of acetaldehyde. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption may favour adaptational changes resulting in the upregulation of candidal acetaldehyde metabolism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.