No abstract

Objective To explore the outcome in women managed expectantly following the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov

Objective To assess systematically the performance of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) CI, specificity, 84.0% (95% CI, LR+, 5.91 (95% CI, 0.07 (95% CI, DOR, 89.0 (95% CI,

Objective To determine, by evaluation of histological slides, images and descriptions of early (second-trimester) placenta accreta (EPA) and placental implantation in cases of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)

Objective Advances in prenatal imaging techniques have led to an increase in the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). 6.67 (95% CI, )). When evaluating the two variants of COS-2 separately, the risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS-1 vs COS-2+ (OR, 5.83 (95% CI, 1.1-30.2)) and this risk was even higher when comparing cases with COS-1 vs COS 12.0 (95% CI,as placenta percreta and increta (OR, 12.85 (95% CI,), while COS-2+ was associated independently with placenta accreta (OR, 4.37 (95% CI,