Objective: To determine if a limited regimen of sequential gradient intermittent pneumatic compression (‘HomeRx’: HRx) is as effective in promoting the healing of chronic venous stasis ulcers as is the Unna's boot (UB), considered the ‘gold standard’ in compression therapy. Design: Fifty-three patients, aged 31–85 years, with ulcers ranging up to 31.8 cm2 (mean 9.9, SE 1.1) were Prospectively randomized to treatments with UB or HRx and followed weekly for 180 days or until healing was complete, whichever came first. The HRx group wore graduated compression stockings, which were removed only while intermittent pneumatic compression was applied bilaterally at home for 1 h each morning and 2 h each evening. The UB was re-applied at least weekly. The two groups were equivalent in their use of hydrocolloid dressings and periods of leg elevation. Setting: Therapy performed at home, with weekly visits to an outpatient clinic. Main outcome measures: Complete ulcer healing and the rate of healing, based on area and perimeter changes; amounts of wound exudate and pain. Results: Complete healing was achieved in 20 of 28 Patients (71%) in the HRx group, compared with 15 of 25 (60%) treated with UB. Three patients had an adverse reaction to UB, one had cellulitis and five were non-compliant. Correcting for these withdrawn patients by life table analysis, healing rates were 76% and 64%, respectively. Healing rates did not correlate with haemodynamic measurements made prior to treatment. Conclusions: Using HRx for just a few hours daily to supplement graduated elastic compression heals venous ulcers at least as well as does the UB, without its disadvantages (e.g. the need for frequent re-application by qualified personnel, difficulty bathing), affording patients greater convenience during treatment.

The natural history of venous reconstruction (VR) in terms of patency and clinical outcome after vascular trauma has not been well documented. This study consists of 32 patients who had VR performed for extremity vascular trauma and were available for long-term assessment (mean follow-up time 49 months, range 6 to 108 months). The types of repair performed were as follows: lateral venorrhaphy (simple repair) (56%), interposition grafting (22%), patch repair (12.5%), and end-to-end repair (9.5%). Seventeen patients underwent venography after the operation with documentation of repair patency in eight patients (46%) and thrombosis in nine (54%). Only two patients had significant clinical edema at follow-up examination. Noninvasive venous evaluation consisted of Doppler ultrasonography, impedance plethysmography, photoplethysmography, and color-flow duplex scanning (CFDS). The photoplethysmography-derived venous refilling time of the injured extremity was 34.9 +/- 16.2 seconds whereas that of the contralateral noninjured extremity was 36.8 +/- 16.1 seconds (p = 0.5). Based on standard criteria for CFDS, 90% of VRs were patent. Eight repairs that were patent in the early postoperative period remained patent on CFDS. Of the nine repairs with early thrombosis, eight were assessed as patent on follow-up CFDS. In conclusion, VR is a durable surgical procedure associated with minimal morbidity, good long-term patency, and preservation of venous competence. The natural history of thrombosed VRs appears to be one of thrombus absorption with recanalization.

No abstract