Ruthenium complexes with piplartine, [Ru(piplartine)(dppf)(bipy)](PF 6 ) 2 ( 1 ) and [Ru(piplartine)(dppb)(bipy)](PF 6 ) 2 ( 2 ) (dppf = 1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino) ferrocene; dppb = 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane and bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine), were recently synthesized and displayed more potent cytotoxicity than piplartine in different cancer cells, regulated RNA transcripts of several apoptosis-related genes, and induced reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated apoptosis in human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells. The present work aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms through which these ruthenium complexes induce cell death in HCT116 cells in vitro , as well as their in vivo action in a xenograft model. Both complexes significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic HCT116 cells, and co-treatment with inhibitors of JNK/SAPK, p38 MAPK, and MEK, which inhibits the activation of ERK1/2, significantly reduced the apoptosis rate induced by these complexes. Moreover, significant increase in phospho-JNK2 (T183/Y185), phospho-p38α (T180/Y182), and phospho-ERK1 (T202/Y204) expressions were observed in cells treated with these complexes, indicating MAPK-mediated apoptosis. In addition, co-treatment with a p53 inhibitor (cyclic pifithrin-α) and the ruthenium complexes significantly reduced the apoptosis rate in HCT116 cells, and increased phospho-p53 (S15) and phospho-histone H2AX (S139) expressions, indicating induction of DNA damage and p53-dependent apoptosis. Both complexes also reduced HCT116 cell growth in a xenograft model. Tumor mass inhibition rates were 35.06, 29.71, and 32.03% for the complex 1 (15 μmol/kg/day), complex 2 (15 μmol/kg/day), and piplartine (60 μmol/kg/day), respectively. These data indicate these ruthenium complexes as new anti-colon cancer drugs candidates.

No abstract

Upon exploration of the chemistry of the combination of ruthenium/arene with anthraquinone alizarin (L), three new complexes with the general formulas [Ru­(L)­Cl­(η6-p-cymene)] (C1), [Ru­(L)­(η6-p-cymene)­(PPh3)]­PF6 (C2), and [Ru­(L)­(η6-p-cymene)­(PEt3)]­PF6 (C3) were synthesized and characterized using spectroscopic techniques (mass, IR, and 1D and 2D NMR), molar conductivity, elemental analysis, and X-ray diffraction. Complex C1 exhibited fluorescence, such as free alizarin, while in C2 and C3, the emission was probably quenched by monophosphines and the crystallographic data showed that hydrophobic interactions are predominant in intermolecular contacts. The cytotoxicity of the complexes was evaluated in the MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative breast cancer), MCF-7 (breast cancer), and A549 (lung) tumor cell lines and MCF-10A (breast) and MRC-5 (lung) nontumor cell lines. Complexes C1 and C2 were more selective to the breast tumor cell lines, and C2 was the most cytotoxic (IC50 = 6.5 μM for MDA-MB-231). In addition, compound C1 performs a covalent interaction with DNA, while C2 and C3 present only weak interactions; however, internalization studies by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy showed that complex C1 does not accumulate in viable MDA-MB-231 cells and is detected in the cytoplasm only after cell permeabilization. Investigations of the mechanism of action of the complexes indicate that C2 promotes cell cycle arrest in the Sub-G1 phase in MDA-MB-231, inhibits its colony formation, and has a possible antimetastatic action, impeding cell migration in the wound-healing experiment (13% of wound healing in 24 h). The in vivo toxicological experiments with zebrafish indicate that C1 and C3 exhibit the most zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity (inhibition of spontaneous movements and heartbeats), while C2, the most promising anticancer drug in the in vitro preclinical tests, revealed the lowest toxicity in in vivo preclinical screening.

No abstract