No abstract

Colonic bacteria have been implicated in the development of colon cancer. We have previously demonstrated that toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), the receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is over-expressed in humans with colitis-associated cancer. Genetic epidemiologic data support a role for TLR4 in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) as well, with over-expression favoring more aggressive disease. The goal of our study was to determine whether TLR4 played a role as a tumor promoter in sporadic colon cancer. Using immunofluorescence directed to TLR4, we found that a third of sporadic human colorectal cancers over-express this marker. To mechanistically investigate this observation, we used a mouse model that over-expresses TLR4 in the intestinal epithelium (villin-TLR4 mice). We found that these transgenic mice had increased epithelial proliferation as measured by BrdU labeling, longer colonic crypts and an expansion of Lgr5+ crypt cells at baseline. In addition, villin-TLR4 mice developed spontaneous duodenal dysplasia with age, a feature that is not seen in any wild-type (WT) mice. To model human sporadic CRC, we administered the genotoxic agent azoxymethane (AOM) to villin-TLR4 and WT mice. We found that villin-TLR4 mice showed an increased number of colonic tumors compared to WT mice as well as increased β-catenin activation in non-dysplastic areas. Biochemical studies in colonic epithelial cell lines revealed that TLR4 activates β-catenin in a PI3K-dependent manner, increasing phosphorylation of β-cateninSer552, a phenomenon associated with activation of the canonical Wnt pathway. Our results suggest that TLR4 can trigger a neoplastic program through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Our studies highlight a previously unexplored link between innate immune signaling and activation of oncogenic pathways, which may be targeted to prevent or treat CRC.

Introduction and objectives The COVID-19 outbreak has had an unclear impact on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess changes in STEMI management during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods Using a multicenter, nationwide, retrospective, observational registry of consecutive patients who were managed in 75 specific STEMI care centers in Spain, we compared patient and procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in 2 different cohorts with 30-day follow-up according to whether the patients had been treated before or after COVID-19. Results Suspected STEMI patients treated in STEMI networks decreased by 27.6% and patients with confirmed STEMI fell from 1305 to 1009 (22.7%). There were no differences in reperfusion strategy (> 94% treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in both cohorts). Patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 outbreak had a longer ischemic time (233 [150-375] vs 200 [140-332] minutes, P < .001) but showed no differences in the time from first medical contact to reperfusion. In-hospital mortality was higher during COVID-19 (7.5% vs 5.1%; unadjusted OR, 1.50; 95%CI, 1.07-2.11; P < .001); this association remained after adjustment for confounders (risk-adjusted OR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.12-3.14; P = .017). In the 2020 cohort, there was a 6.3% incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization. Conclusions The number of STEMI patients treated during the current COVID-19 outbreak fell vs the previous year and there was an increase in the median time from symptom onset to reperfusion and a significant 2-fold increase in the rate of in-hospital mortality. No changes in reperfusion strategy were detected, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed for the vast majority of patients. The co-existence of STEMI and SARS-CoV-2 infection was relatively infrequent.

TRIF signaling triggers the amplification of macrophage bactericidal activity sufficient to eliminate invading intestinal pathogens through the sequential induction of IFN-β and IFN-γ from macrophages and NK cells, respectively.

Median survival time was 24 months (range, 2-60 months) among the nine patients who died, whereas median follow-up time in the remaining 19 patients is 33.4 months (range, 4.7-73 months). A trend toward a reduction in MUC4 antigen expression in high-grade tumors (55% expression) compared with low-grade (91% expression) and intermediate-grade (100% expression) tumors is identified (chi square, p =.0975). Patients with tumors expressing MUC4 antigens are at reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; p =.0531). Adjustment for pathologic grade, T stage, and age results in a much higher risk of death for patients whose tumors do not express MUC4 antigens, although this does not meet statistical significance (HR, 26.6; p =.1). Analysis of recurrence adjusting for T stage reveals that patients whose tumors do not express MUC4 antigens are at increased risk of recurrence compared with patients whose tumor expresses MUC4 antigens (HR, 6.37; p =.03). ErbB2 receptor staining is noted in seven of 28 patients, with five of these seven showing 2+ and 3+ membrane-staining patterns. Adjustment for pathologic grade and age suggests that patients whose tumors express high levels of ErbB2 (2+, 3+) are at increased risk of death compared with patients with low or no expression of ErbB2 (HR, 2.29; p =.32). MUC4 antigen positivity is seen in two of the five cases with 2+ and 3+ staining for ErbB2. CONCLUSIONS.: These findings suggest MUC4 antigen positivity is associated with reduced risk of death and reduced risk of recurrence and may identify a subset of patients with more favorable prognosis. Although limited by small sample size, analysis reveals ErbB2 overexpression is not consistently associated with MUC4 antigen positivity and might be associated with increased risk of death.