Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of an infusion of NaCl 0.9% 500 ml during preparatory plasmapheresis or apheresis on the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content in separated plasma. Methods: 32 donors of plasma were studied in a crossover design after informed consent on one day without NaCl 0.9% 500 ml during apheresis and on another day with infusion of NaCl 0.9% 500 ml during apheresis. Infusion of NaCl 0.9% 500 ml was given step by step in divided doses after each cycle through the harness set of the Haemonetics® plasma collecting system 2 (PCS2). Concentrations of IgG in serum and in plasma were measured by an immunoturbidimetric assay. Percentages of IgG concentrations in plasma were calculated by dividing the IgG concentration in plasma by the mean serum IgG concentrations (× 100). Results: Without infusion of NaCl 0.9% 500 ml, the mean percentage of IgG in separated plasma was 85.5 ± 2.3% while it was 80.5 ± 3.4% when NaCl 0.9% 500 ml was given. The difference between the two samples was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that the gradual infusion of NaCl 0.9% 500 ml during apheresis causes a statistically highly significant difference of IgG content in separated plasma.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the course of hemoglobin (HGB) concentration and hematocrit (HCT) in donor blood during and after preparatory plasmaphereses (PP) without NaCl and with an infusion of 500 ml 0.9% NaCl during PP. Methods: After informed consent 32 plasma donors were studied in a crossover design. They underwent PP once without NaCl infusion and once, on a different day, with infusion of 500 ml 0.9% NaCl. HGB concentration and HCT values in donor blood were analyzed using a Sysmex KX-21N analyzer. The values of HGB concentration and HCT before PP were set to 100%. Changes in HGB concentration and HCT were calculated in percent directly after PP, and after 24 and 72 h. Results: During PP, there was a notable change in HGB concentration (11.2 ± 4.0%) and HCT (11.6 ± 3.9%) in donor blood. The difference between the 2 samples without and with NaCl was highly significant (p < 0.001). After 24 and 72 h, all differences were reduced. Conclusion: We observed significant changes in HGB concentration and HCT in donor blood during PP. We recommend a concomitant infusion of 500 ml 0.9% NaCl during PP to all donors.
Treatment by placing the donor in the Trendelenburg position and rapid infusion of 1,000 mL saline appears to be an effective procedure for resolving severe acute hypotension associated with donor plasmaphereses.
The aim of this study was to investigate the disposition of propafenone and its Phase I and II metabolites in relation to kidney function under steady-state conditions. The mechanism of the renal handling of propafenone glucuronides (filtration, secretion) was also examined. Racemic (R/S) propafenone was administered to 7 young volunteers, to 5 older patients with a normal glomerular filtration rate and to 4 patients with chronic renal failure. No difference was found in the plasma concentrations of propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone between the three groups. The propafenone glucuronide (PPFG) concentration was elevated in the older compared to the younger subjects (S-PPFG: 544 vs. 222 nmol.ml-1.mol-1; R-PPFG: 576 vs. 304 nmol.ml-1.mol-1). Although Glomerular filtration rate did not differ, the renal clearance of propafenone glucuronides was reduced in the former group, which could be attributed to their impaired renal secretion. A dramatic increase in propafenone glucuronide concentration was observed in the patients with renal failure (S-PPFG: 2783 nmol.ml-1.mol-1; R-PPFG: 7340 nmol.ml-1.mol-1). In summary, the disposition of propafenone and of its active metabolite 5-hydroxypropafenone was not affected by kidney dysfunction, indicating that no dose adjustment is necessary in patients with renal failure. The accumulation of drug glucuronides in older patients with apparently normal kidney function should be taken into account as a possible factor modifying drug therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.