p16 Ink4a is a protein involved in regulation of the cell cycle. Currently, p16 Ink4a is considered a tumor suppressor protein because of its physiological role and downregulated expression in a large number of tumors. Intriguingly, overexpression of p16 Ink4a has also been described in several tumors. This review attempts to elucidate when and why p16 Ink4a overexpression occurs, and to suggest possible implications of p16 Ink4a in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer.

In an attempt to identify molecules that clearly reflect the oncogenic role of cell signaling pathways in human tumors, we propose a concept we term ''funnel factor'', a factor where several oncogenic signals converge and drive the proliferative signal downstream. In studies done in various tumor types, the expression of key cell signaling factors, including Her1 and Her2 growth factor receptors, as well as the RAS-RAF-mitogenactivated protein kinase and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin pathways was correlated with the associated clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. The downstream factors p70, S6, 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, which play a critical role in the control of protein synthesis, survival, and cell growth, were also analyzed. We found that phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (p-4E-BP1) expression in breast, ovary, and prostate tumors is associated with malignant progression and an adverse prognosis regardless of the upstream oncogenic alterations. Thus, p-4E-BP1 seems to act as a funnel factor for an essential oncogenic capability of tumor cells, self-sufficiency in growth signals, and could be a highly relevant molecular marker of malignant potential. Further investigation into this concept may identify additional funnel factors in the oncogenic pathways and provide potential therapeutic targets. [Cancer Res 2007;67(16):7551-5]

In this review, we highlight the role of intratumoral heterogeneity, focusing on the clinical and biological ramifications this phenomenon poses. Intratumoral heterogeneity arises through complex genetic, epigenetic, and protein modifications that drive phenotypic selection in response to environmental pressures. Functionally, heterogeneity provides tumors with significant adaptability. This ranges from mutual beneficial cooperation between cells, which nurture features such as growth and metastasis, to the narrow escape and survival of clonal cell populations that have adapted to thrive under specific conditions such as hypoxia or chemotherapy. These dynamic intercellular interplays are guided by a Darwinian selection landscape between clonal tumor cell populations and the tumor microenvironment. Understanding the involved drivers and functional consequences of such tumor heterogeneity is challenging but also promises to provide novel insight needed to confront the problem of therapeutic resistance in tumors.