In light of pioneering findings in the 1980s and an estimation of more than 130 million global annual births, umbilical cord blood (UCB) is considered to be the most plentiful reservoir of cells and to have regenerative potential for many clinical applications. Although UCB is used mainly against blood disorders, the spectrum of diseases for which it provides effective therapy has been expanded to include non-hematopoietic conditions; UCB has also been used as source for regenerative cell therapy and immune modulation. Thus, collection and banking of UCB-derived cells have become a popular option. However, there are questions regarding the cost versus the benefits of UCB banking, and it also raises complex ethical and legal issues. This review discusses many issues surrounding the conservation of UCB-derived cells and the great potential and current clinical applications of UCB in an era of new therapies. In particular, we describe the practical issues inherent in UCB collection, processing, and long-term storage as well as the different types of ‘stem’ or progenitor cells circulating in UCB and their uses in multiple clinical settings. Given these considerations, the trend toward UCB will continue to provide growing assistance to health care worldwide.

The aim of this narrative review is to report on the current knowledge regarding the clinical use of umbilical cord blood (CB) based on articles from PubMed and clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. An increasing amount of evidence suggests that CB may be used for both early diagnostics and treatment of cerebral palsy. The acidity of CB and its biochemical parameters, including dozens of cytokines, growth factors, and other metabolites (such as amino acids, acylcarnitines, phosphatidylcholines, succinate, glycerol, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and O-phosphocholine) are predictors of future neurodevelopment. In addition, several clinical studies confirmed the safety and efficacy of CB administration in both autologous and allogeneic models, including a meta-analysis of five clinical trials involving a total of 328 participants. Currently, nine clinical trials assessing the use of autologous umbilical CB in children diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or cerebral palsy are in progress. The total population assessed in these trials exceeds 2500 patients.

Peripheral blood microchimerism after pregnancy or solid organ transplantation has been widely studied, but a consensus on its detection has not yet been adopted. The objective of this study was to establish a panel of reproducible molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for detection and quantification of foreign cells in an individual. We analyzed length polymorphisms generated by short tandem repeat (STR) and variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) markers. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A and -B polymorphisms were detected by reference strand conformation analysis (RSCA). Class II polymorphisms on HLA-DRB1 locus were analyzed both by classical PCR-sequence-specific primers (SSP) and by quantitative PCR (Q-PCR). Also, sex-determining region-y gene (SRY) gene allowed specific male donor discrimination and quantification by Q-PCR in female recipients. Binomial statistical distribution analysis was used for each molecular technique to determine the number of PCR replicates of each sample. This analysis allowed the detection of the lowest detectable microchimerism level, when present. We could detect microchimerism in more than 96% and more than 86% of cases at levels as low as 1:10(5) and 1:10(6) donor per recipient cells (DPRC), respectively, using Q-PCR for SRY or for nonshared HLA-DRB1 alleles. These techniques allowed as low as 1 genome-equivalent cell detection. Lower levels (nanochimerism) could be detected but not quantified because of technique limitations. However, classical PCR methods allowed detection down to 1:10(4) DPRC for HLA-DRB1 PCR-SSP. The clinical application of these techniques in solid organ transplanted recipients showed microchimerism levels ranging from 1:10(4) to 1:10(6) DPRC after kidney or heart transplantation, and 1 log higher (1:10(3) to 1:10(6) DPRC) after liver transplantation. In conclusion, the standardization of molecular microchimerism detection techniques will allow for comparable interpretation of results in microchimerism detection for diagnostic or research studies.

No abstract

Microchimerism was frequent after kidney transplantation and correlated with a significantly lower incidence of rejection. We propose that early microchimerism monitoring could help early detection of low rejection-risk recipients.