Three hundred twenty-five women with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast who had failed one prior chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced disease were randomized to receive 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Enrollment was closed on October 31, 1984, after 165 patients were randomized to mitoxantrone and 160 patients to doxorubicin. Patients randomized to the two treatment groups were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. The response rate to mitoxantrone was 20.6%, to doxorubicin 29.3% (P = .07). The median response duration was 151 days for the mitoxantrone group and 126 days for the doxorubicin group (P = .16). The median TTF was 70 days in the mitoxantrone group and 104 days in the doxorubicin group (P = .36). The median survival of patients initially randomized to receive mitoxantrone was 273 days; for doxorubicin 268 days (P = .40). There were three responses among 77 patients crossed over to mitoxantrone after initial treatment with doxorubicin. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both drugs was leukopenia. There was significantly less severe and less frequent toxicity with mitoxantrone administration. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 9.5% of mitoxantrone patients and 25.3% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). The incidence of severe stomatitis and mucositis was 0.6% in the mitoxantrone group and 8.4% in the doxorubicin group (P = .001). Severe alopecia occurred in 5.1% of mitoxantrone patients and 61.0% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). A life-table comparison of the cumulative dose to the development of a cardiac event showed that mitoxantrone had significantly less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin (P = .0005). This study demonstrates that mitoxantrone is active as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Compared with doxorubicin it appears to be marginally less active and significantly less toxic. We conclude that mitoxantrone can be used alone or with other standard drugs to palliate the symptoms of metastatic breast cancer, especially in settings where drug toxicity is an important consideration.

In 1977 the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated a prospectively randomized clinical trial for women with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. In this study 1891 patients were randomized to receive L-phenylalanine mustard and 5-fluorouracil (PF) either with or without tamoxifen (T). In this interim report findings are presented concerning disease-free survival (DFS) and survival as related to age and to estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) content of the tumor. The median follow-up time is 3 yr. Patients 50 yr of age or older with either 1-3 or more than 3 positive axillary nodes had a markedly longer disease-free survival on PFT than did those receiving PF adjuvant therapy (p less than 0.001). The effectiveness of PFT was related to the levels of tumor receptors. Patients 50 yr old or more with both tumor ER and PR levels of 10 fmole or more ("high") displayed the greatest benefit in disease-free survival from PFT (p = 0.004). Analyses by age indicated that it is more appropriate to divide patients of 50 yr or older into two age groups, 50-59 and 60-70 yr old. In the former the survival results were poorer on PFT when tumor PR was low, whereas, regardless of receptor levels, those 60-70 yr old experienced an advantage on PFT. In women under 50 yr of age, there was no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.64), but survival results favored the PF over the PFT treated (p = 0.06). Patients under 50 yr with tumor ER and PR levels under 10 fmole ("low") had a poorer survival when given PFT (p = 0.003). Those whose tumors demonstrated a high ER and a low PR also had a shorter survival on PFT (p = 0.01). The observation of no benefit in younger patients when both receptor levels were high, but a benefit in older patients with receptor-poor tumors, indicates that, at least according to the conditions of this study, the difference between the two age groups cannot be explained by the association of age with receptor content. Multivariate analyses considered the effects of the number of positive nodes, age, ER, and PR. They support the conclusion that, while nodes and ER exert strong prognostic influences in both PF- and PFT-treated patients, the PR content of tumors is a stronger predictor of the effectiveness of PFT therapy than is ER content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In a retrospective study we determined the relation between estrogen receptors and the response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy in 70 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-four of 45 patients with low or absent estrogen-receptor values (less than 10 fmol per milligram of cytoplasmic protein) had objective responses to chemotherapy, whereas only three of 25 patients with higher values (greater than 10 fmol per milligram of cytoplasmic protein) responded (P less than 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, menopausal status, disease-free interval, Karnofsky index or prior therapy. Differences in sites of involvement or type of chemotherapy did not account for the increased response rate in receptor-negative patients. We conclude that estrogen-receptor values are an important predictor of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

In this sample of adults near or in retirement, resilience predicted lower HCU and improved SRH. Resilience is a dynamic state that can be enhanced in adults with positive impacts on subjective well-being and HCU.