Given the increased need for consistent quantitative image analysis, variations in radiomics feature calculations due to differences in radiomics software were investigated. Two in-house radiomics packages and two freely available radiomics packages, MaZda and IBEX, were utilized. Forty 256 × 256-pixel regions of interest (ROIs) from 40 digital mammograms were studied along with 39 manually delineated ROIs from the head and neck (HN) computed tomography (CT) scans of 39 patients. Each package was used to calculate first-order histogram and second-order gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features. Friedman tests determined differences in feature values across packages, whereas intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified agreement. All first-order features computed from both mammography and HN cases (except skewness in mammography) showed significant differences across all packages due to systematic biases introduced by each package; however, based on ICC values, all but one first-order feature calculated on mammography ROIs and all but two first-order features calculated on HN CT ROIs showed excellent agreement, indicating the observed differences were small relative to the feature values but the bias was systematic. All second-order features computed from the two databases both differed significantly and showed poor agreement among packages, due largely to discrepancies in package-specific default GLCM parameters. Additional differences in radiomics features were traced to variations in image preprocessing, algorithm implementation, and naming conventions. Large variations in features among software packages indicate that increased efforts to standardize radiomics processes must be conducted. © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Incorporation of KBP models into the clinical trial setting may have a profound impact on the quality of trial results, owing to the increase in consistency and standardization of planning, especially for treatment sites or techniques that are nonstandard.

No abstract

Studies investigating the effects of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters have mostly been limited to non-human phantoms to limit exposure to patients. This study investigates these variations using a cadaveric liver and determines harmonization methods to mitigate these variations. A reference CT scan of a cadaveric liver was acquired along with 16 modified scans. Modified scans were obtained with altered image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In each slice, the liver was segmented and used to calculate 142 features. Student’s t-tests assessed differences between reference and modified scans for each feature after correcting for multiple comparisons. Features were harmonized between reference and modified scans using histogram normalization, pixel resampling, Butterworth filtering, resampling and filtering combined, and ComBat harmonization. The number of features reflecting significant differences before and after harmonization were compared across imaging parameters. Reducing the field-of-view (FOV) and using coronal instead of axial scans resulted in the greatest number of features reflecting significant differences (67.6%, and 35.9%, respectively) and resulted in the greatest median relative change in feature values (25.4% and 18.2%, respectively). Changes in tube voltage, pitch, and slice interval resulted in the smallest number of features reflecting significance (0.7%) with median relative changes in feature <2%. Histogram normalization reduced or maintained the number of significantly different features for all scans, while ComBat reduced the number of significantly different features to zero for all scans. The remaining harmonization methods had mixed effects: resampling reduced the number of features reflecting significant differences for half of the imaging parameters, while filtering alone and filtering combined with resampling both reduced the number of features reflecting significance for 10 of the 16 parameters. The dependence of radiomic features on image acquisition and reconstruction parameters varies in a cadaveric liver; however, various harmonization methods have shown promise in mitigating these dependencies, particularly ComBat.

No abstract