Objectives The objective of the current review was to synthesize the literature on intersectionality relative to disparities across the cancer care continuum. A model to support future intersectional cancer research was proposed. Methods Web‐based discovery services and discipline‐specific databases were queried for both peer‐reviewed and gray literature. Study screening and data extraction were facilitated through the Covidence software platform. Results Among 497 screened studies, 28 met study inclusion criteria. Most articles were peer‐reviewed empirical studies (n = 22) that focused on pre‐diagnosis/screening (n = 19) and included marginalized racial/ethnic (n = 22) identities. Pre‐cancer diagnosis, sexual orientation and race influenced women's screening and vaccine behaviors. Sexual minority women, particularly individuals of color, were less likely to engage in cancer prevention behaviors prior to diagnosis. Race and socioeconomic status (SES) were important factors in patient care/survivorship with worse outcomes among non‐white women of low SES. Emergent themes in qualitative results emphasized the importance of patient intersectional identities, as well as feelings of marginalization, fears of discrimination, and general discomfort with providers as barriers to seeking cancer care. Conclusions Patients with intersectional identities often experience barriers to cancer care that adversely impact screening, diagnosis, treatment, as well as survivorship. The use of an “intersectional lens” as a future clinical and research framework will facilitate a more multidimensional and holistic approach to the care of cancer patients.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: There is increased interest in the role of spirituality in the cancer care context, but how it may inspire individuals to pursue a career as a healthcare provider is unknown. We sought to determine the relationship between intrinsic religiosity, religious identity, provider role, and spiritual motivations to practice medicine. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to healthcare providers at a large, Midwest Comprehensive Cancer Center. The relationship between provider type, intrinsic religiosity, religious identity, and spiritual motivations to practice medicine was assessed with binary logistic regression. Results: Among 340 participants, most were female (82.1%) or Caucasian (82.6%) and identified as being religious (57.5%); median age was 35 years (IQR: 31-48). Providers included nurses (64.7%), physicians (17.9%), and “other” (17.4%). Compared with physicians, nurses were less likely to agree that they felt responsible for reducing pain and suffering in the world (OR: 0.12, p = 0.03). Similarly, “other” providers were less likely than physicians to believe that the practice of medicine was a calling (OR: 0.28, p = 0.02). Providers with a high self-reported intrinsic religiosity demonstrated a much greater likelihood to believe that the practice of medicine is a calling (OR:1.75, p = 0.001), as well as believe that personal R&S beliefs influence the practice of medicine (OR:3.57, p < 0.001). Provider religious identity was not associated with spiritual motivations to practice medicine (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Intrinsic religiosity had the strongest relationship with spiritual motivations to practice medicine. Understanding these motivations may inform interventions to avoid symptoms of provider burnout in cancer care.