No abstract

The role of N-methyl-o-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in Pavlovian fear conditioning was examined using the NMDA antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV). Either APV (5 #g/rat) or saline was administered before the training phase, the testing phase, or both. APV completely blocked acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. The L enantiomer of APV did not affect the acquisition of conditional fear. To separate encoding from consolidation processes, APV was administered either before or immediately after the footshock unconditional stimulus (US) during the training phase. The results indicate that APV must be present during the US to produce its effects on fear conditioning. The behavioral effect of the drug is not due to analgesic action because APV did not alter pain sensitivity. The data suggest that NMDA receptors are critical for the acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. These effects on fear conditioning are parallel to the in vitro effects of APV on the acquisition but not expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) and suggest that endogenously generated NMDAdependent LTP participates in the neural plasticity underlying fear conditioning.

In fear conditioning, a rat is placed in a distinct environment and delivered footshock. The response to the footshock itself is called an activity burst and includes running, jumping, and vocalization. The fear conditioned to the distinct environment by the footshock elicits complete immobility termed freezing. Lesions of the ventral periaqueductal gray (vPAG) strongly attenuate freezing. However, lesions of the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (dlPAG) increase the amount of freezing seen to conditional fear cues acquired under conditions in which intact rats do not demonstrate much fear conditioning. To examine the necessity of these regions in the acquisition and expression of fear, we performed five experiments that examined the effects of electrolytic lesions of the dlPAG and the vPAG in learned and unlearned fear. In experiment 1, lesions of the vPAG strongly attenuated, whereas lesions of the dlPAG enhanced, unconditional freezing to a cat. In experiment 2, lesions of the dlPAG made before but not after training enhanced the amount of freezing shown to conditional fear cues acquired via immediate footshock delivery. In experiment 3, vPAG lesions made either before or after training with footshock decreased the level of freezing to conditional fear cues. Neither dlPAG lesions nor vPAG lesions affected footshock sensitivity (experiment 4) or consumption on a conditioned taste aversion test that does not elicit antipredator responses (experiment 5). On the basis of these results, it is proposed that activation of the dlPAG produces inhibition of the vPAG and forebrain structures involved with defense. In contrast, the vPAG seems to be necessary for postencounter freezing defensive behavior.

Previous research has indicated that the competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist APV (DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate) prevents the Pavlovian conditioning of fear to contextual stimuli when tested 24 hr, but not immediately, after training. The present study investigated this differential time-dependent effect of APV on fear conditioning. Rats were given either APV or saline and presented with 3 footshocks in a distinctive chamber. Promptly after the shock, rats that had received APV exhibited a species-typical fear response-freezing. However, the freezing lasted for only a short period of time (less than 3 min) compared with that of controls. An immediate-shock procedure showed that freezing was entirely a conditional response to the chamber. In addition, the results of a savings test suggest that APV impairs storage rather than retrieval processes. These results indicate that there are two temporally distinct associative fear processes, a short-term NMDA-independent conditional fear and a long-term NMDA-dependent conditional fear.

Massed presentation of unsignaled shock results in less conditional freezing to contextual cues than do distributed presentations. Consistent with an account of the learning deficit based on the perceptual-defensive-recuperative theory, the massed-shock deficit was attenuated by preexposure to shock or the conditioning context. This formulation was also successfully applied to the deficit in conditioning that occurs when a single shock is given immediately after placement in a context. Opponent-process theory was not supported by 2 findings: (a) The deficit was neither enhanced by shock preexposure nor reduced by an opioid antagonist, and (b) unconditional reactions were greater with massed shock. Inconsistent with the suggestion that the effect is a performance artifact specific to freezing, the massed-shock deficit was apparent for a 2nd measure of conditioning.