No abstract

Background For low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), active surveillance (AS) may confer comparable oncological outcomes to radical prostatectomy (RP). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes are important to consider, yet few studies have examined HRQoL for patients managed with AS. This study compared longitudinal HRQoL in a prospective, racially diverse, and contemporary cohort of patients who underwent RP or AS for low-risk PCa. Methods Beginning in 2007, HRQoL data from validated questionnaires (EPIC and SF-36) were collected by the Center for Prostate Disease Research in a multi-center national database. Patients aged ≤75 that were diagnosed with low-risk PCa and elected RP or AS for initial disease management were followed for three years. Mean scores were estimated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for baseline HRQoL, demographic and clinical patient characteristics. Results Of the patients with low-risk PCa, 228 underwent RP and 77 underwent AS. Multivariable analysis revealed that RP patients had significantly worse sexual function, sexual bother, and urinary function at all time points compared to patients on AS. Differences in mental health between groups were below the threshold for clinical significance at one year. Conclusions This study found no differences in mental health outcomes but worse urinary and sexual HRQoL for RP patients compared to AS patients for up to three years. These data offer support for management of low risk PCa with AS as a means for postponing the morbidity associated with RP without concomitant mental health declines.

No abstract

This is the first report utilizing ACS NSQIP to review surgical approaches as well as the impact of trainee involvement on clinical outcomes. The increased complication rates and cost of healthcare might be mitigated by awareness, investment in surgical simulation laboratories, and competency assessment.

Purpose: The AUA (American Urological Association) Position Statement on opioid use recommends using opioids only when necessary. We sought to determine if routine prescribing of opioids is necessary for pain control after vasectomy, and if an association exists with persistent use. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent vasectomy in clinic between April 2017 and March 2018. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, including those initially prescribed opioids and those not receiving opioid prescriptions at the time of vasectomy. The initial pain medication regimen depended on the standard prescription practice of each provider. Encounters with a medical provider for scrotal pain within 30 days, subsequent opioid prescriptions and new persistent opioid prescriptions between 90 and 180 days were compared between the 2 groups using the Fisher exact test. Results: Between April 2017 and March 2018 a total of 228 patients underwent clinic vasectomy as performed by 8 urologists. At the time of vasectomy 102 patients received opioid prescriptions and 126 received no opioid prescriptions. There was no statistically significant difference between the opioid and nonopioid groups in encounters for scrotal pain (12.7% vs 18.4%, p [ 0.279). The incidence of new persistent opioid use was 7.8% in the opioid cohort compared to 1.5% in the nonopioid cohort (p [ 0.046). Conclusions: Opioids, which do not appear to be necessary in men who undergo vasectomy, were associated with persistent use in 7.8% of patients at 3 to 6 months. In the face of an opioid epidemic urologists should take action to limit over prescription of opioids after vasectomy.