Background Physician burnout, widespread across medicine, is linked to poorer physician quality of life and reduced quality of care. Data on prevalence of and risk factors for burnout among anesthesiologists are limited. The objective of the current study was to improve understanding of burnout in anesthesiologists, identify workplace and personal factors associated with burnout among anesthesiologists, and quantify their strength of association. Methods During March 2020, the authors surveyed member anesthesiologists of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Burnout was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. Additional survey questions queried workplace and personal factors. The primary research question was to assess rates of high risk for burnout (scores of at least 27 on the emotional exhaustion subscale and/or at least 10 on the depersonalization subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey) and burnout syndrome (demonstrating all three burnout dimensions, consistent with the World Health Organization definition). The secondary research question was to identify associated risk factors. Results Of 28,677 anesthesiologists contacted, 13.6% (3,898) completed the survey; 59.2% (2,307 of 3,898) were at high risk of burnout, and 13.8% (539 of 3,898) met criteria for burnout syndrome. On multivariable analysis, perceived lack of support at work (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 5.3 to 8.5); working greater than or equal to 40 h/week (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.75); lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, queer/questioning, intersex, and asexual status (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.63); and perceived staffing shortages (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.76 to 2.42) were independently associated with high risk for burnout. Perceived lack of support at work (odds ratio, 10.0; 95% CI, 5.4 to 18.3) and home (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.69 to 2.69) were most strongly associated with burnout syndrome. Conclusions The prevalence of burnout among anesthesiologists is high, with workplace factors weighing heavily. The authors identified risk factors for burnout, especially perceived support in the workplace, where focused interventions may be effective in reducing burnout. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Several recent studies have reported a considerably higher overall survival (OS) rate in females in various geographic regions This study further investigates the characteristics of melanoma that contribute to OS of women residing in the United States. Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression models were used to analyze differences in demographics, treatment, and survival of invasive cutaneous melanoma in men and women diagnosed from 2004 to 2016 in the National cancer database. In 316 966 patients met inclusion criteria. Men had a significantly higher median age of diagnosis at 61 years (interquartile range or IQR: 51-72) in comparison to women where the median age of diagnosis was 55 years (IQR: 43-68) (P < .0001). The most common primary site for men was the trunk (35.5%), whereas the lower extremities were the most common primary site for women (30.3%). Women had a higher 5 year (82.6%) and 10 year (73.1%) OS compared to 5 year and 10 year OS of 72.2% and 58.7%, respectively, in men (P < .0001). When adjusting for confounders, female gender was independently associated with improved OS (ref: male HR = 0.791; 95% confidence interval 0.773-0.809; P < .0001). Overall, we conclude that female gender is an independent favorable prognostic factor for melanoma survival.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract