No abstract

Procrastination, or the intentional delay of due tasks, is a widespread phenomenon in college settings. Because procrastination can negatively impact learning, achievement, academic self-efficacy, and quality of life, research has sought to understand the factors that produce and maintain this troublesome behavior. Procrastination is increasingly viewed as involving failures in self-regulation and volition, processes commonly regarded as executive functions. The present study was the first to investigate subcomponents of self-reported executive functioning associated with academic procrastination in a demographically diverse sample of college students aged 30 years and below (n = 212). We included each of nine aspects of executive functioning in multiple regression models that also included various demographic and medical/psychiatric characteristics, estimated IQ, depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. The executive function domains of initiation, plan/organize, inhibit, self-monitor, working memory, task monitor, and organization of materials were significant predictors of academic procrastination in addition to increased age and lower conscientiousness. Results enhance understanding of the neuropsychological correlates of procrastination and may lead to practical suggestions or interventions to reduce its harmful effects on students' academic performance and well-being.

Objective: We sought to evaluate two approaches with varying time and complexity in engaging adolescents with an Internet-based preventive intervention for depression in primary care. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing primary care physician motivational interview (MI, 10–15 minutes) + Internet program versus brief advice (BA, 2–3 minutes) + Internet program. Setting: Adolescent primary care patients in the United States, ages 14–21. Participants: 83 individuals (40% non-white) at increased risk for depressive disorders (sub-threshold depressed mood > 3–4 weeks) were randomly assigned to either the MI group (n=43) or the BA group (n=40). Main Outcome Measures: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-A) – Adolescent and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Results: Both groups substantially engaged the Internet site (MI, 90.7% versus BA 77.5%). For both groups, CES-D-10 scores declined (MI, 24.0 to 17.0 p < 0.001; BA, 25.2 to 15.5, p < 0.001). The percentage of those with clinically significant depression symptoms based on CES-D-10 scores declined in both groups from baseline to twelve weeks, (MI, 52% to 12%, p < 0.001; BA, 50% to 15%, p < 0.001). The MI group demonstrated declines in self-harm thoughts and hopelessness and was significantly less likely than the BA group to experience a depressive episode (4.65% versus 22.5%, p = 0.023) or to report hopelessness (MI group of 2% versus 15% for the BA group, p=0.044) by twelve weeks. Conclusions: An Internet-based prevention program in primary care is associated with declines in depressed mood and the likelihood of having clinical depression symptom levels in both groups. Motivational interviewing in combination with an Internet behavior change program may reduce the likelihood of experiencing a depressive episode and hopelessness.