Decomposition of organic matter strongly influences ecosystem carbon storage 1 . In Earth-system models, climate is a predominant control on the decomposition rates of organic matter [2][3][4][5] . This assumption is based on the mean response of decomposition to climate, yet there is a growing appreciation in other areas of global change science that projections based on mean responses can be irrelevant and misleading 6,7 . We test whether climate controls on the decomposition rate of dead wood-a carbon stock estimated to represent 73 ± 6 Pg carbon globally 8 -are sensitive to the spatial scale from which they are inferred. We show that the common assumption that climate is a predominant control on decomposition is supported only when local-scale variation is aggregated into mean values. Disaggregated data instead reveal that local-scale factors explain 73% of the variation in wood decomposition, and climate only 28%. Further, the temperature sensitivity of decomposition estimated from local versus mean analyses is 1.3-times greater. Fundamental issues with mean correlations were highlighted decades ago 9,10 , yet mean climate-decomposition relationships are used to generate simulations that inform management and adaptation under environmental change. Our results suggest that to predict accurately how decomposition will respond to climate change, models must account for local-scale factors that control regional dynamics.Climate is traditionally thought to be the predominant control on decomposition rates at global and regional scales, with biotic factors controlling only local rates 2,4 . Biotic factors are divided into decomposer organisms, such as soil microbes, and the quality (for example, chemical composition) of the plant litter they decompose. Recent work suggests that litter quality may be more important than climate in controlling decomposition rates across biomes worldwide 3,11 , but the influence of decomposer organisms is still assumed limited across broad climate gradients 12 . A core reason for this assumption is that climate is considered a primary control on the activity of decomposers. As such, across climate gradients, mean temperature and moisture availability are assumed to explain much of the variation in the activity of decomposer organisms and hence decomposition rates of organic matter. These climate-decomposition relationships are used to parameterize and evaluate Earth-system models 13 . It is therefore important to test the assumption that climate drives decomposer activities because proper understanding of these activities is needed to inform model projections such as carbon cycle-climate feedbacks 1,14 .Climate-decomposition relationships are typically developed from regional to global studies that use the mean response of decomposition to climate and litter quality drivers [2][3][4][5] . There is growing awareness in other areas of global change science that using mean responses masks the fine-scale variation required to understand effects of environmental change 6,7 , although the...

Biological invasions are often closely associated with human impacts and it is difficult to determine whether either or both are responsible for the negative impacts on native communities. Here, we show that human activity, not biological invasion, is the primary driver of negative effects on native communities and of the process of invasion itself. In a large-scale experiment, we combined additions of the exotic fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, with 2 disturbance treatments, mowing and plowing, in a fully crossed factorial design. Results indicate that plowing, in the absence of fire ants, greatly diminished total native ant abundance and diversity, whereas fire ants, even in the absence of disturbance, diminished some, but not all, native ant abundance and diversity. Transplanted fire ant colonies were favored by disturbance. In the absence of disturbance and on their own, fire ants do not invade the forest habitats of native ants. Our results demonstrate that fire ants are ''passengers'' rather than ''drivers'' of ecological change. We propose that fire ants may be representative of other invasive species that would be better described as disturbance specialists. Current pest management and conservation strategies should be reassessed to better account for the central role of human impacts in the process of biological invasion.community organization ͉ competition ͉ disturbance ͉ exotic species ͉ pest management

No abstract

Summary1. The fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is a globally distributed invasive ant that is largely restricted to disturbed habitats in its introduced range. For more than half a century, biologists have believed its success results from superior competitive abilities relative to native ant species, as well as an escape from their natural enemies. 2. We used large volumes of hot water to kill fire ant colonies, and only fire ant colonies, on experimental plots in pastures, and found that populations and diversity of co-occurring ants did not subsequently increase. 3. These results are contrary to classical predictions and indicate that S. invicta is not a superior competitor that suppresses native ants, and that the low diversity and abundance of native ants in degraded ecosystems does not result from interaction with fire ants. Instead, other factors such as prior disturbance and recruitment limitation may be the primary limiting factors for native species in these habitats.

No abstract