Introduction Successful rehabilitation of patients with burn injuries requires an in-depth occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) evaluation early in the acute phase of a patient’s injury to develop a detailed therapy plan of care. In addition, it is a standard of the American Burn Association for verified burn centers to have a comprehensive rehabilitation program designed for burn patients within 24 hours of admission. However, there is no standardized report for tracking timeliness of issuing PT/OT orders or completion of therapy evaluations by PT/OT after a patient is admitted to a burn unit. This quality improvement study details the creation of a “Time to PT/OT Order Placement and Evaluation Completion Report” and results of a quality improvement process used to improve these metrics. Methods A multi-disciplinary workgroup was created and included a burn surgeon, PT and program nurse coordinator and an electronic report was created in collaboration with the hospital’s business intelligence team. The report included the following metrics: average time from admission to PT/OT order placement, average time from PT/OT order placement to therapist acknowledgement, and average time from PT/OT order placement to therapist completion of initial evaluation. A baseline report was run (3-months) and results were analyzed. A quality improvement process was then put into place including education of burn attending physicians, fellows, and rotating residents on timeliness of therapy order placement, therapy staff education on findings and a new process for morning coordination of burn therapist caseloads to prioritize new evaluations, and initiation of monthly reporting at the burn joint practice committee meetings. The report was then run for an additional 3-months and results were analyzed. Results Baseline and post-quality improvement process results (3-month averages) were as follows: Average time from admission to PT/OT order placement increased from 3.4 to 8.3 hrs, average time from PT/OT order placement to therapist acknowledgement decreased from 43.2 to 31.5 hrs, and average time from PT/OT order placement to therapist completion of evaluation decreased from 43.6 to 35.1 hrs. Conclusions After development of this report findings showed that the quality improvement process used to improve timeliness of inpatient PT/OT initial evaluation completion was effective. In addition, this report has been useful for metric reporting during burn joint practice committee meetings, the ABA verification process and burn therapy staffing/daily caseload management. Applicability of Research to Practice This report could be used by other burn centers to help track and improve timeliness of initial PT/OT evaluations for acute burns. In addition, metrics created from this report could be used for the ABA verification process and help justify burn unit therapy staffing needs.

Introduction Flexion gloves are a quick and easy way to provide a dynamic stretch to the digits for patients with limited composite flexion range of motion (ROM) or who are at risk for digit extension burn scar contractures. However, the flexion glove has been observed clinically to bias metacarpal phalangeal (MCP) joint flexion ROM when compared to the proximal and distal phalangeal (PIP and DIP) joints. The purpose of this case study is to demonstrate the use of a custom thermoplastic hand-based splint to block MCP joint motion in order to better isolate PIP and DIP joint ROM for a patient with primary PIP and DIP flexion ROM limitations. Methods A custom, thermoplastic, palmer hand-based splint was fabricated with an opening for the thumb and the splint extending to the proximal phalanxes stopping below the PIP joints in order to block MCP joint flexion ROM as seen in Figure 1b. Composite flexion passive ROM (PROM) measurements were taken for all MCP, PIP, and DIP joints of digits 2-4 with only the flexion glove donned and with the hand-based splint applied over the flexion glove as seen in Figure 1a and 1c. Results An increase in combined PIP and DIP joint PROM was found for all digits when the hand-based splint was donned over the flexion glove compared to the flexion glove only (see Table 1). These increases in combined PIP and DIP PROM included 35° for the index finger, 10° for the middle finger, 20° for the ring finger and 30° for the small finger, with an overall mean increase of 23.75° Conclusions This easy splinting technique combined with a flexion glove was effectively used to bias stretch of the PIP and DIP joints into flexion for a patient with adequate MCP flexion ROM and impaired PIP and DIP flexion ROM caused by burn scar contracture. Applicability of Research to Practice Using an off the shelf flexion glove and a basic hand-based splint, therapists can use this technique to easily adjust the angle of pull to maximize the benefit from a flexion glove to address specific joint limitations of the finger caused by burn scar contracture.

Introduction Potential complications of autografting for burn wound coverage of the hand include edema, hematoma formation, and bleeding; all of which can lead to graft failure. Self-adherent elastic wraps are commonly used by burn rehabilitation clinicians to minimize complications by providing graft protection and decreasing edema post-operatively; however, there is a lack of evidence on its impact on graft healing. The purpose of this study was to determine if the application of self-adherent elastic wraps to the hand in the operating room after autografting improves the percentage of graft viability. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for 37 patients with burned hands who underwent autografting from January 2017 to July 2021. Grafted hands were categorized into 2 groups: post-operative dressings with and without self-adherent elastic wraps. Post-operative day 4 pictures for both groups were collected from the medical record and a blinded digital photograph analysis of graft viability was performed by 5 expert raters including 3 Burn Surgery Fellows,1 Burn Attending Surgeon and 1 Hand Attending Surgeon. A rating system was developed based on percentage of graft take as seen in Table 1 and presence of hematomas were assessed. Results Patients who received self-adherent elastic wraps suffered burns with significantly larger TBSA (p=0.007) and were admitted for a longer duration (p=0.009) than patients who did not. Patients with elastic wrap had a higher percentage of grafts with >95% take (64.0% vs 41.7%, p=0.227) and a lower rate of hematoma formation (24.0% vs. 41.7%, p=0.443). Intra-class correlation coefficient across raters was 0.90 for graft take and 0.87 for determining presence of hematomas, indicating excellent interrater reliability. Conclusions Despite suffering larger burns requiring longer hospitalizations, patients who received elastic wrap had a higher rate of >95% graft take than those without. This study is limited by a relatively small sample size, however these findings warrant continued research in the use of self-adherent elastic wrap to maximize graft take in hand burns.