No abstract

Background Recent literature reports a decrease in healthcare-seeking behaviours by adults during the Covid-19 pandemic. Given that emergency general surgery (GS) conditions are often associated with high morbidity and mortality if left untreated, the objective of this study was to describe and quantify the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on rates of emergency department (ED) utilization and hospital admission due to GS conditions. Methods This cohort study involved the analysis of an institutional database and retrospective chart review. We identified adult patients presenting to the ED in a network of three teaching hospitals in Montreal, Canada during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (March13–May13, 2020) and a control pre-pandemic period (March13–May13, 2019). Patients with GS conditions were included in the analysis. ED utilization rates, admission rates and 30-day outcomes were compared between the two periods using multivariate regression analysis. Results During the pandemic period, 258 patients presented to ED with a GS diagnosis compared to 351 patients pre-pandemically (adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 0.75; p < 0.001). Rate of hospital admission during the pandemic was also significantly lower (aRR = 0.77, p < 0.001). Patients had a significantly shorter ED stay during the pandemic (adjusted mean difference 5.0 h; p < 0.001). Rates of operative management during the pandemic were preserved compared to the pre-pandemic period. There were no differences in 30-day complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.46; p = 0.07), ED revisits (aOR 1.10; p = 0.66) and (re)admissions (aOR 1.42; p = 0.22) between the two periods. Conclusion There was a decrease in rates of ED utilization and hospital admissions due to GS conditions during the first wave of the Covid -19 pandemic; however, rates of operative management, complications and healthcare reutilization were unchanged. Although our findings are not generalizable to patients who did not seek healthcare, it was possible to successfully uphold institutional standards of care once patients presented to the ED. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08956-3.

Objectives Previous studies have described the negative impact that tube feeding of children with complex chronic diseases has on the caregivers’ emotions, relationships and daily life. It is unclear whether these negative experiences persist or change during and after the weaning process. We sought to explore mothers’ experiences and perceptions of their child being weaned off tube feeding within a Paediatric Feeding Program (PFP). Methods We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with mothers whose children &lt;4 years old had experienced feeding tube weaning within an outpatient, family-centred, telemedicine-supported PFP. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results We conducted 9 interviews with mothers of children (n = 10) in the PFP at which point data saturation was achieved. Three main themes emerged: a) the initial emotional toll on mothers stemming from fear of perceived adverse consequences of decreasing tube feeds and uncertainty surrounding efficacy of weaning; b) achievement of weaning via a family-centered approach through gaining trust, close contact, and collaboration with the team; and c) attainment of mothers’ expectations of family life through transformed relationships and social activities. A positive evolution of emotions was observed, attributable to the support of the PFP. Conclusions These experiences suggest that our outpatient weaning program had a positive impact on the stress, fear, and relational challenges that mothers reported before and during initial tube weaning. These findings highlight potential areas of discussion with families at multiple stages of the child’s tube feeding experience, to help normalize emotions for families and support coping strategies.

Introduction During the COVID-19 pandemic, the redeployment of operating room (OR) staff resulted in a significant ramp-down of elective surgery. To mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on surgical education, this study was planned to estimate the impact of the first wave of the pandemic on the participation of general surgery residency and fellowship trainees in operative procedures. Methods This study is a retrospective review of all adult general surgery procedures performed at 3 sites of an academic health care network. Cases performed during the first wave of the pandemic (March–June 2020) were compared to the same period of the previous year pre-pandemic (March–June 2019). Trainees were categorized as junior (Post-Graduate-Year [PGY] 1–2), senior (PGY3-5), or fellows (PGY6-7). Operating exposure was defined as (1) the total number of cases attended by at least one trainee and (2) total time spent in the OR by all trainees (hours). The impact of the pandemic was estimated as percentage of baseline (2019). Results During the first wave of the pandemic, a total of 914 cases were performed, compared to 1328 in the pre-pandemic period (69%). Junior trainees were more affected than senior trainees with reductions in both case volume (68% versus 78% of baseline attendance) and time (68% versus 77% of baseline operating time). Minimally invasive surgery fellows were most severely affected trainees and colorectal fellows were least affected (14% and 75% of baseline cases, respectively). Participation in emergency surgery cases and surgical oncology cases was relatively preserved (87% and 105% of baseline, respectively). Conclusions The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced operative exposure for general surgery trainees by approximately 30%. Procedure-specific patterns reflected institutional policies for prioritizing cancer operations and emergency surgeries. These findings may inform the design of remediation activities to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on surgical training.