Background Biobanks are considered primary means+ of supporting contemporary research, in order to deliver personalized and precise diagnostics with public acceptance and participation as a cornerstone for their success. Aims This study aims to assess knowledge, perception, and attitudes towards biomedical research and biobanking among students at the University of Jordan. Methodology An online questionnaire was designed, developed, and piloted. It was divided into 5 sections that included questions related to issues of biomedical research and biobanking as well as factors influencing the decision to participate. Results Responses from 435 students revealed that 52.9% previously heard of biobanks. There was an overwhelming acceptance for participation in biomedical, genetic, and biobanking research. A blood sample was the most preferred for donation. Protection of privacy, informed consent prior to donation, approval of an ethics committee, and trust towards researchers were the most important factors associated with willingness to participate. On the other hand, the vagueness of the type of research performed on the biospecimens and the unavailability of general research results to the donor had a negative connotation. There was no clear agreement on the type of informed consent preferred by students, but to be contacted and informed of research results was preferred by the majority. Students also preferred the disposal of biospecimens and information when deciding to withdraw from participation. Conclusion There is strong enthusiasm among students to participate in biomedical research and biobanking with all rights reserved thus providing hope for a very promising future in Jordan.

BackgroundBiobanks are considered a primary mean of supporting contemporary research, in order to deliver personalized and precise diagnostics with public acceptance and participation as a corner stone for their success.AimsThis study aims to assess knowledge, perception, and attitudes towards biomedical research and biobanking among students at the University of Jordan.MethodologyAn online questionnaire was designed, developed, and piloted. It was divided into 5 sections that included questions related to issues of biomedical research and biobanking as well as factors influencing decision to participate.ResultsResponses from 435 students revealed that 52.9% previously heard of biobanks. There was overwhelming acceptance for participation in biomedical, genetic, and biobanking research. A blood sample was the most preferred for donation. Protection of privacy, a consent prior to donation, approval of an ethics committee, and trust towards researchers were the most important factors associated with willingness to participate. On the other hand, vagueness of the type of research performed on samples and not receiving research results had a negative connotation. There was no clear agreement on the type of consent preferred by students, but to be contacted and informed of research results was preferred by the majority. Students also preferred disposal of samples and information when deciding to withdraw from participation.ConclusionThere is strong enthusiasm among students to participate in biomedical research and biobanking with all rights reserved thus providing hope for a very promising future in Jordan.

Introduction/Background* Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a rare complication of simple hysterectomy, however urinary fistulas can occur in patients when cervix and surrounding tissue is distorted due to fibroids or cervical cancer Methodology A 43 years old lady was referred to our centre with complaints of continuous urinary incontinence post-surgery. She had undergone simple hysterectomy with salpingoophrectomy for undiagnosed cervical cancer.Clinical examination, cystoscopy and staging contrast CT scan showed 2 cm defect in posterior wall of urinary bladder communicating with vagina. There was no evidence of parametrial, vaginal or lymph node disease. Review histopathology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. Da Vinci Xi system was used with port placements at the level of umbilicus. Prior to docking, bilateral ureteric catheters along with catheter in the fistula track was placed cystoscopically. Dome of the bladder was opened to visualise fistulous track completely. Bladder and vaginal wall were identified around the fistulous margin and mobilized. Vaginal edges were sutured in transverse direction and bladder edges were sutured in longitudinal direction so that both the suture lines were perpendicular to each other to reduce tissue tension and better healing. Continuous V-lock sutures were used for both vagina and bladder repair and an omental flap was placed at the fistula site for healing and preventing adhesions. Blood loss was 200ml. She had an indwelling bladder catheter for 2 weeks along with a prescription of bladder relaxants Result(s)* Her postoperative period was uneventful and CT cystogram on day 14 showed no urinary leak. She was referred for further adjuvant treatment in view of incompletely treated cervical cancer and presence of few peritoneal nodules diagnosed during repair. At 6 months follow up of VVF repair, patient is continent with no urinary complains, however she has progressive disease. Conclusion* In conclusion, Urinary fistula repair through minimal access route is feasible and allows early recovery with reduced morbidity.