Small, electronegative elements contribute more electrostatic and orbital stabilization to the anti → gauche isomerization, and greater steric repulsion. The first and the latter actually oppose our traditional view of conformational equilibria.

The well-known gauche preference in FCCX systems, where X is an electronegative element from Period 2, is widely exploited in synthetic, medicinal, and material chemistry. It is rationalized on the basis of σ(C-H) → σ*(C-F) hyperconjugation and electrostatic interactions. The recent report (Thiehoff, C.; et al. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3565) showed that the fluorine gauche effect can extend to Period 3 elements, such as sulfur. The aim of the present work is to disclose factors governing conformational behavior of FCCS containing systems. We examine conformational preferences in seven classes of compounds by ab initio and DFT calculations and rationalize the results by quantitatively decomposing the anti/gauche isomerization energy into contributions from electrostatic, orbital, dispersion, and Pauli interactions, and energy spent on structural changes. The results show that the fluorine/sulfur gauche effect is primarily electrostatic (63-75%), while all orbital interactions contribute 22-41% to stabilizing interactions. Stereoelectronic effects, involved in orbital interactions, also play a role in gauche conformer stabilization.

Aromaticity-antiaromaticity switch upon singlet-triplet transition of some biologically and synthetically important monoheterocycles (heteroatom = N, O, Si, P, S) derived from benzene, naphthalene and anthracene, was studied by employing energetic,...

We present an efficient, simple, metal- and solvent-free silica-gel-promoted synthesis of functionalized conjugated dienes by sequential aza-Michael/Michael reactions by starting from commercially available primary amines and propiolic esters. The scope and usefulness of the method is demonstrated for 31 examples, including a range of propiolic esters, aliphatic amines, and differently substituted aromatic amines. For aliphatic amines, the products were obtained within 0.5 to 4 h in 52 to 85 % yield, compared with 3.5 to 22 h under classical solution-phase synthesis, which proceeds with similar or lower yields. The method was found to be particularly useful for weakly nucleophilic aromatic amines, which provided products in 21 to 73 % yield over 2.5 to 9.5 h compared with yields of 0 to 49 % over 1 to 6 d under standard solution-phase conditions, and for more hydrophobic esters that gave products in yields of 47 to 79 % over 1 to 3 h compared with 0 to 45 % over 4 to 114 h in solvent.

No abstract