Malunion after a distal radius fracture is very common and if symptomatic, is treated with a so-called corrective osteotomy. In a traditional distal radius osteotomy, the radius is cut at the fracture site and a wedge is inserted in the osteotomy gap to correct the distal radius pose. The standard procedure uses two orthogonal radiographs to estimate the two inclination angles and the dimensions of the wedge to be inserted into the osteotomy gap. However, optimal correction in 3-Dspace requires restoring three angles and three displacements. This paper introduces a new technique that uses preoperative planning based on 3-D images. Intraoperative 3-D imaging is also used after inserting pins with marker tools in the proximal and distal part of the radius and before the osteotomy. Positioning tools are developed to correct the distal radius pose in six degrees of freedom by navigating the pins. The method is accurate ( d 1.2 mm, ϕ 0.9°, m TRE = 1.7 mm), highly reproducible (SE (d) < 1.0 mm, SE (ϕ) ≤ 1.4°, SE (m) (TRE) = 0.7 mm), and allows intraoperative evaluation of the end result. Small incisions for pin placement and for the osteotomy render the method minimally invasive.

No abstract

The authors retrospectively investigated the postoperative position of the distal radius after a corrective osteotomy using 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) imaging techniques to determine whether malposition correlates with clinical outcome. Twenty-five patients who underwent a corrective osteotomy were available for follow-up. The residual positioning errors of the distal end were determined retrospectively using standard 2-D radiographs and 3-D computed tomography evaluations based on a scan of both forearms, with the contralateral healthy radius serving as reference. For 3-D analysis, use of an anatomical coordinate system for each reference bone allowed the authors to express the residual malalignment parameters in displacements (Δx, Δy, Δz) and rotations (Δφx, Δφy, Δφz) for aligning the affected bone in a standardized way with the corresponding reference bone. The authors investigated possible correlations between malalignment parameters and clinical outcome using patients' questionnaires. Two-dimensional radiographic evaluation showed a radial inclination of 24.9°±6.8°, a palmar tilt of 4.5°±8.6°, and an ulnar variance of 0.8±1.7 mm. With 3-D analysis, residual displacements were 2.6±3 (Δx), 2.4±3 (Δy), and -2.2±4 (Δz) mm. Residual rotations were -6.2°±10° (Δφx), 0.3°±7° (Δφy), and -5.1°±10° (Δφz). The large standard deviation is indicative of persistent malalignment in individual cases. Statistically significant correlations were found between 3-D rotational deficits and clinical outcome but not between 2-D evaluation parameters. Considerable residual malalignments and statistically significant correlations between malalignment parameters and clinical outcome confirm the need for better positioning techniques.