1 In six patients with chronic bronchitis, serial changes in both ventilatory function and plasma theophylline concentrations were measured simultaneously for 8 h following 500 mg aminophylline intravenously. 2 Using empirical mathematical models which can integrate this data, parameters were estimated which can express response as a linear function of steady state plasma theophylline levels. 3 Taking Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) as the target response, the mean (+/‐ s.d.) increase in FVC was 0.06 +/‐ 0.02 l/micrograms ml‐ 1, starting with pretreatment values in the range 1‐21. 4 This analytical approach could be used to determine whether or not a patient with chronic bronchitis could obtain a satisfactory response to theophylline at plasma levels normally encountered in clinical practice.
1 The effect of inhaled salbutamol following a maximally effective dose of theophylline given by intravenous infusion was determined in 12 patients with chronic bronchitis. 2 An initial single intravenous dose study was performed to estimate each patient's theophylline kinetics and to identify those patients who would respond to theophylline. 3 Pulmonary function was assessed at hourly intervals during four to five incremental steady state theophylline infusions over the concentration range 5‐25 mg/l. 4 Inhaled salbutamol (400 micrograms) was administered after the maximum effect from theophylline had been achieved or when theophylline concentrations reached 25 mg/l without maximum effect: pulmonary function was again assessed. 5 Ten patients achieved a further significant improvement in pulmonary function after salbutamol: in five, predicted values for FVC were exceeded. 6 Patients with chronic bronchitis may benefit from the combination of theophylline and salbutamol if steady state theophylline concentrations of 15‐20 mg/l are achieved.
This paper reports a study of the bronchodilator effects of doses of the beta 2 agonist fenoterol and the muscarinic blocker ipratropium suitable for administering in combination as a standard dose of two discharges from a single metered-dose pressurised aerosol. In 12 middle-aged bronchitics who had already been shown to respond to both types of drug the combination was almost always a little (6% on average) more effective than either drug singly. It is possible that an equal or better effect could have been obtained if fenoterol or perhaps ipratropium had been given alone in an individually determined maximally effective dose.
We have previously shown that inhaled salbutamol further increases the bronchodilator response after the maximum effect of theophylline has been obtained in patients with severe chronic bronchitis. We now report the results of adding maximally effective doses of theophylline to the maximum response obtainable from salbutamol in ten of these patients. We constructed dose response curves to ensure maximum possible effect from salbutamol. Response plateaus (in nine out of ten patients) were achieved with cumulative doses of between 200 micrograms and 3,000 micrograms salbutamol and there was a significant response (p less than 0.05) in every subject: the mean FVC response was 1.11 (ranging from 0.5 to 1.81) and the mean FEV1 response was 0.41 (ranging from 0.1 to 0.81). Theophylline, in their previously determined maximally effective doses, produced statistically significant (p less than 0.05) small further increases in both FVC (0.2 to 0.61) and FEV (0.1 to 0.61) in four patients only. The other six did not respond. In patients classified as chronic bronchitics there is clearly a wide variation in response to bronchodilators and a surprising degree of reversibility can be achieved. But because of this variation in response, conventional drug doses may be too small in some cases. Ideally, each bronchodilator should be prescribed after some form of individual dose response studies. Although this acute study shows little or no benefit in the height of the bronchodilator response the usefulness of this combination can only really be decided after similar studies including the duration of effect in long term administration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.