Background Ten patients with breast cancer and a breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) mutation, who presented with stages I to III breast cancer between December 2006 and 2007, were treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin, followed by mastectomy and conventional chemotherapy. Methods The excised breast tissue and lymph nodes were examined for the presence of residual disease. Results Pathologic complete response was observed in nine patients (90%). Conclusions Platinum-based chemotherapy appears to be effective in a high proportion of patients with BRCA1-associated breast cancers. Clinical trials are now warranted to determine the optimum treatment for this subgroup of breast cancer patients.
Background: This trial evaluated whether preoperative short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) were superior to chemoradiation in rectal cancers with clinical (c)T4 or fixed cT3. Previously, we reported early results showing no differences in the radical surgery rate (primary end point). In the short-course/CCT group, we observed lower acute toxicity of preoperative treatment and better overall survival (OS). We updated results to determine whether the benefit in OS was sustained and to evaluate late complications.Patients and methods: Patients with cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer were randomized either to preoperative 5 Â 5 Gy and three cycles of FOLFOX4 or to chemoradiation (50.4 Gy with bolus 5-Fu, leucovorin and oxaliplatin).Results: Patients (N ¼ 515) were eligible for analysis, 261 in the short-course/CCT group and 254 in the chemoradiation group. The median follow-up was 7.0 years. The difference in OS was insignificant [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.15; P ¼ 0.38). However, the difference in early OS favouring short-course/CCT previously reported was observed again, being 9% at 3 years (95% CI 0.5% to 17%). This difference disappeared later; at 8 years OS was 49% in both groups. There was no difference in disease-free survival (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.75-1.19; P ¼ 0.65) at 8 years 43% versus 41% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively. The corresponding values for cumulative incidences of local failure and distant metastases did not differ and were HR ¼ 1.08, 95% CI 0.70-1.23, P ¼ 0.60, 35% versus 32% and HR ¼ 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.23, P ¼ 0.54, 36% versus 34%, respectively. The rate of late complications was similar (P ¼ 0.66), grade 3þ being 11% versus 9% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively.
Conclusion:The superiority of preoperative short-course/CCT over chemoradiation was not demonstrated.
Several predispositions to colorectal cancer have been identified, but little is known about genetic susceptibilities to disease in older persons. Colorectal cancer is a risk in Crohn's disease and is believed to be associated with an inappropriate inflammatory response. Recently, the NOD2 gene has been associated with Crohn's disease, which further strengthens the notion that the inflammatory response plays a crucial role in this disease. Several mutations have been identified in the NOD2 gene, which appear with significantly higher frequency in patients with the disease. One such mutation (3020insC) is believed to be clearly causative because it results in a prematurely truncated protein with a predicted reduction in functional efficiency. In this report, we have examined the frequency of the 3020insC mutation in a series of 856 individuals including 556 patients with colorectal cancer. The frequency of the 3020insC mutation in a consecutive series of 250 non-hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients >50 years of age was significantly elevated compared with the control population (odds ratio, 2.23; P ؍ 0.0046). The results indicate that NOD2 may be a predisposing factor to colorectal cancer characterized by an older average age of disease onset in persons who do not harbor any other genetic predisposition to disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.