No abstract

No abstract

Our objective was to describe our experience with orbital amyloidosis, and illustrate the different forms of presentation. This was a retrospective case series of four patients with biopsy-proven orbital amyloi- dosis, over the period from 2014 to 2016. We describe its diagnostic and clinical characteristics, management and systemic study. The series comprised three women and one man of mean age 52 ± 9.4 years. Affected sites were the lacrimal gland, tarsal conjunctiva, lacrimal sac and orbit. In three of the four patients, calcifications were observed. Three patients had associated ptosis. The patient with orbital involvement suffered an unusual vascular complication during surgery and systemic disease was detected. Management included debulking and complete resection of the lesion. In conclusion, orbital amyloidosis presents as a wide variety of forms. Its diagnosis is biopsy-based. Calcifications in biopsy specimens or images should raise suspicion of amyloidosis. It is important to always check for systemic amyloidosis.

Background: The endoscopic superior eyelid approach is a relatively novel mini-invasive technique that is currently investigating for skull base cancers. However, questions remain regarding specific approach-related complications when treating different skull base tumors. This study aims to analyze any surgical complications that occurred in our preliminary consecutive experience, with specific focus on orbital outcome. Methods: A retrospective and consecutive cohort of patients treated via a superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach at the Division of Neurosurgery of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona was analyzed. Patients features were described in detail. Complications were divided into 2 groups to analyze separately the approach-related complications, and those resulting from tumor removal. The ocular complications were subdivided into early ocular status (<3 weeks), late ocular status (3–8 weeks), and persistent ocular complications. The “Park questionnaire” was used to determine patient's satisfaction related to the transorbital approach. Results: A total of 20 patients (5 spheno-orbital meningiomas, 1 intradiploic Meningioma, 2 intraconal lesions, 1 temporal pole lesion, 2 trigeminal schwannoma, 3 cavernous sinus lesions, and 6 petroclival lesions) were included in the period 2017–2022. Regarding early ocular status, upper eyelid edema was detected in all cases (100%) associated with diplopia in the lateral gaze in 30% of cases, and periorbital edema in 15% of cases. These aspects tend to resolve at late ocular follow-up (3–8 weeks) in most cases. Regarding persistent ocular complications, in one case of intraconal lesion, a limitation of eye abduction was detected (5%). In another patient with intraconal lesion, an ocular neuropathic pain was reported (5%). In 2 cases of petroclival menigioma, who were also treated with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt, slight enophthalmus was observed as a persistent complication (10%). According to the Park questionnaire, no cosmetic complaints, no head pain, no palpable cranial irregularities, and no limited mouth opening were reported, and an average of 89% of general satisfaction was encountered. Conclusions: The superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach is a safe and satisfactory technique for a diversity of skull base tumors. At late follow-up, upper eyelid edema, diplopia, and periorbital edema tend to resolve. Persistent ocular complications are more frequent after treating intraconal lesions. Enophthalmus may occur in patients with associated ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. According to patient's satisfaction, fairly acceptable results are attained.