The application of strain gauges as recommended by the ASTM standards provides accurate strain measurements in isotropic materials. However, their use in composite materials becomes more challenging due to their anisotropic nature. In this study, we hypothesized that the use of the distributed sensing system and the three-dimensional digital image correlation, which can average strain along a line and surface, respectively, may account for strain variability in composite materials. This study shows an investigation on the mechanical properties of unidirectional, cross-ply, and angle-ply carbon-epoxy specimens using strain gauges, distributed sensing system, and digital image correlation. The Bhattacharyya distance method was used to provide a preliminary evaluation of the closeness of the three different measurement techniques while the B-basis statistical method was used to analyze the experimental data in order to obtain a more conservative and reliable material parameter compared to the conventional averaged value, recommended by ASTM standards. Finally, a finite element model was created in Ansys Workbench™ as a means of evaluating the implication of a single point strain gauges measurement, versus a line or a surface strain measurement. The finite element analysis investigation was performed at a laminae level using the measured experimental elastic modulus and at a lamina–lamina level in which the elastic modulus of the unidirectional case was used as input in all the laminate configurations. The former analysis showed good agreement between the finite element analysis and all the strain measurement systems with an averaged percentage difference below 5%. The latter analysis showed a higher discrepancy in the measured percentage difference. A comparison between the finite element analysis and the strain gauges measurements showed an overall percentage difference between the range of 10% and 26%. Distributed sensing system and three-dimensional digital image correlation measurements provided an overall percentage difference below 10% for all the specimen configurations with a maximum percentage difference recorded for the longitudinal angle-ply case of approximately 9%.
Most general aviation (GA) aircraft are designed for safe-life based upon a crack initiation type failure mechanism, e.g., Miner's rule. However, newer GA aircraft have fatigue crack growth as a design option. In addition, it may be necessary to evaluate a field event such as a cracked structure to ascertain the remaining life. Therefore, a risk based probabilistic damage tolerance analysis (PDTA) program is needed in several aerospace situations. A comprehensive probabilistic damage tolerance method requires a combination of deterministic crack growth, inspection methods, probabilistic methods, and random variable modeling to provide a single probability-of-failure, cumulative probability-of-failure, and hazard rate with and without inspection. In this work, a general methodology to conduct probabilistic crack growth based damage tolerance methodology for small airplanes will be developed and incorporated in a computer software. Random variables can be included in the model using Monte Carlo Sampling (MCS) and efficient numerical integration algorithms. Probabilistic damage tolerance analysis involves mathematically complex models and computational expensive simulations, which makes these analyses very inefficient. In this work the computational weight will be reduced using an error based adaptive surrogate model; the surrogate model will include the most influential random variables. The surrogate model will be used as a temporary substitution for the original crack growth model. An example problem will be presented to demonstrate the methodology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.