Afrontar las restricciones de la pandemia antes siquiera de comenzar el ciclo lectivo fue un gran desafío para los estudiantes de primer año de Medicina. Repentinamente las universidades se cerraron y se debió reestructurar toda la actividad académica. El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo valorar la opinión de los alumnos de Anatomía que debieron cursar en 2020 sin actividades presenciales y quienes cursan en el presente año con escasa asistencia, exclusivamente para la parte práctica. Se realizó una encuesta en línea para que evaluaran los factores que incidieron en su formación anatómica durante este periodo de condiciones tan particulares. Determinamos 3 grupos: los alumnos que cursaron en 2020, los que cursan actualmente y los que comenzaron en 2020 y vuelven a cursar en 2021. La mayoría no había tenido experiencia de estudio virtual previamente. La valoración de las clases fue media y el principal problema fue la falta de acceso a los cuerpos y el material cadavérico para el estudio de la parte practica, seguido por la ansiedad, falta de motivación y concentración para el estudio, la falta de interacción con sus compañeros y docentes. La ventaja más destacada fue el ahorro de tiempo y, en menor medida, la reducción de gastos. En conclusión, los estudiantes consideran que la pérdida más importante se basa en la falta de acceso a los cuerpos y material cadavérico, aunque la mayoría tiene expectativas de recuperarlo por diferentes vías. En general consideran que la pandemia tendrá serias consecuencias en su formación médica.
The COVID-19 pandemic affected all activities. In the university environment, the areas where practical activity is essential were very difficult to compensate for the training deficit. Within the basic subjects of Health Sciences, Anatomy students suffered from the impossibility of accessing cadaveric material, but also many other resources. The objective of this study was to assess the opinion of the students regarding the changes imposed by the pandemic and their attitude towards donating their own bodies. Material and Method: A voluntary survey was carried out to the students who attended in 2020 and 2021, with different levels of restrictions and information regarding donation. The questions referred to demographic data, importance that is assigned to the bodies for the learning of Anatomy, if they were student assistants in that period, if the pandemic affected their training, if they know that the body can be donated and that the Faculty has a program, if they would like to obtain more information, collaborate and / or donate their own body. The results showed great similarity, except that Group 2 had less knowledge of the possibility of donating and the existence of a program, without affecting the will to donate. Also the reasons for not donating were a bit more ambiguous in that group. In addition, some results were compared with similar groups from 2018, showing that the study groups valued cadaveric material less but had a more positive attitude towards donation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.