In 2000, the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) published a position paper that defined critical care pharmacy services as fundamental, desirable, and optimal. A task force was developed that included individuals who are members of the ACCP Critical Care Practice and Research Network, the SCCM clinical pharmacy and pharmacology section, and the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists to develop an opinion paper with three primary objectives: to provide recommendations for the level of preparation and training of pharmacists to practice in critical care, to develop recommendations for the credentialing of pharmacists providing critical care services, and to develop mechanisms for documenting and justifying intensive care unit (ICU) pharmacy services. Each objective was addressed to accommodate the levels of services defined as fundamental, desirable, or optimal, and are targeted at all pharmacists providing or wanting to provide pharmacy services to critically ill patients. The training and preparing of the pharmacist caring for critically ill patients is discussed in the context of the knowledge and skills required to provide pharmacy services in the ICU. Credentialing of the critical care pharmacist and the documentation of services take into account the various scopes of practice, and recommendations are based on current and idealistic mechanisms. A detailed outline is provided for the process of services justification. This paper provides a foundation that is focused on delivering direct and proactive patient care services, particularly at the desirable and optimal levels, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the level of pharmacy services provided to the care of critically ill patients. This commentary should be of interest to numerous stakeholders including pharmacists, other pharmacy department staff, other ICU health care professionals, hospital and academic administrators, accrediting agencies, government officials, and payers. The task force encourages the profession of pharmacy in general to incorporate key recommendations provided in this document with respect to specialized training, credentialing, and service justification.

Dexmedetomidine is an alternative to traditional sedatives and analgesics in critically ill patients. The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in adults likely persist beyond 24 hours, without the emergence of rebound effects after discontinuation.

A perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate did not reduce the rate of acute kidney injury or adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease who underwent cardiac surgery.

The use of vasopressin for the treatment of septic shock is increasing. Few reports of fluid and electrolyte complications of this therapy have been reported. A neurologically impaired, 53-year-old man with a history of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone developed apparent transient diabetes insipidus and acute hypernatremia after being treated with vasopressin. He was treated for presumed septic shock with intravenous vasopressin 0.01-0.10 U/minute. His blood pressure did not improve with this therapy, and his course was complicated by hyponatremia during the vasopressin infusion. Discontinuation of the infusion was followed by a profound (8.4 L) diuresis and rapid onset of hypernatremia (serum sodium concentration increased from 132 to 157 mEq/L over 8 hrs). Although urine osmolality was not measured during the patient's diuresis, the rapid changes in serum sodium concentration can be explained only by an inappropriate water diuresis. The diuresis ceased when the vasopressin infusion was resumed. We concluded that these findings are most consistent with transient diabetes insipidus. The safety and efficacy of intravenous vasopressin have not been established in patients with septic shock and underlying disorders of water homeostasis. The drug may have diminished vasoconstrictive effects in this patient population. Careful monitoring of water and sodium balance is warranted in all patients treated with vasopressin for septic shock.

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor with antithrombotic, antifibrinolytic, and antiinflammatory effects. It is effective in reducing bleeding and the need for blood transfusions after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Additional benefits, such as cerebral protection, are hypothesized but not yet thoroughly substantiated. The safety of aprotinin has been questioned based on a phase IV analysis of large data sets, including patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Potential risks including increased occurrences of stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and death are implied by these analyses; however, adequate study group matching is lacking from these nonrandomized, retrospective studies. In October 2007, a large randomized controlled trial comparing antifibrinolytics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was stopped after a preliminary analysis suggested a trend toward an increase in all-cause 30-day mortality associated with aprotinin. Subsequently, the manufacturer of aprotinin temporarily suspended marketing and halted all shipment of aprotinin on a worldwide basis. Pending a complete analysis of this study, the use of aprotinin could be considered as one component of a blood conservation strategy. After contemplating the benefits and risks of this controversial drug, clinicians should reserve its use for patients at high risk for postoperative blood loss.