The capacity of four neurologically healthy young adults to distinguish opposing directions of cutaneous motion was determined at five different sites along the proximal-distal axis of the upper limb. Constant-velocity brushing stimuli (ranging from 0.5 to 32.0 cm/sec) were delivered through an aperture in a Teflon plate that was securely positioned in light contact with the skin. In one series of experiments, directional sensitivity in d' units was assessed at each site, using an aperture length of 0.75 cm. In a second series of experiments, the aperture length required to obtain the same criterion level of directional sensitivity at each site was determined. To attain the sensitivity reached at distal sites, a proximal stimulus had to traverse a longer chord of skin. Specifically, chords 5.9 times longer on average (range = 5.4-6.2) were required on the proximal forearm than on the index finger pad. This finding suggests that relative directional sensitivity increases sixfold from the proximal forearm to the finger pad. Moreover, relative directional sensitivity on the shoulder was comparable to that observed on the proximal forearm for two of the subjects, and approximately one-half that observed on the proximal forearm for the other two subjects. In addition to such a prominent spatial gradient in relative directional sensitivity, the velocity of stimulus motion at which directional sensitivity was highest increased systematically as the test site was shifted from the finger pad to the proximal forearm. Specifically, the optimal velocity on the finger pad varied among subjects from 1.5 to 9.4 cm/sec (mean = 5.4 cm/sec), and on the proximal forearm from 11.5 to 31.2 cm/sec (mean = 18.6 cm/sec). The optimal velocity on the shoulder was not significantly different from that observed on the proximal forearm. The results suggest that effective and informed clinical testing of patients' capacity to distinguish opposing directions of motion on cutaneous regions that differ in peripheral innervation density requires appreciation of the sensitivities of different skin regions, as well as the unique velocity dependency of direction discrimination at each skin site.

The percepts evoked by sequential stimulation of sites in close spatial proximity (::=; 2.5 em) on the face were studied. Both method-of-limits and magnitude-estimation procedures were used to identify and characterize alterations in the percepts produced by systematic changes in the temporal and spatial parameters of the sequence. Each site was stimulated by a vertically oriented row of miniature vibrating probes. Apparent motion was consistently perceived when the delay between the onsets of sequentially activated rows (interstimulus onset interval, or ISOl) fell within a relatively narrow range of values, the lower limit of which approximated 5 msec. Both the upper limit and the perceived smoothness and continuity of the motion percepts (goodness of motion) increased with the duration for which each row stimulated the skin over the range evaluated, 15-185 msec. For the successive activation of only two rows, goodness of motion was not influenced by changes in their separation from 0.4 to 2.5 cm. The ISOl values at which magnitude estimates of goodness of motion were highest increased with the duration for which each row stimulated the skin. As such, maximum goodness of motion decreased with increases in the apparent velocity of motion. When the number of sequentially activated rows was increased from two to four or more, the quality of the motion percepts improved. For the successive activation of multiple closely spaced rows, values of ISOI at which numerical estimates of goodness of motion were highest approximated integral fractions of the duration for which each row stimulated the skin. In this situation, the probes rose and fell in a regular, step-locked rhythm to simulate an edge-like or rectangular object moving across the skin. The goodness of motion so attained was relatively independent of the apparent velocity of motion.The movement of a natural object across the skin evokes a rich perceptual experience and one that is acutely sensitive to subtle changes in the physical parameters of stimulation (see, e.g., Essick, Afferica, et al., 1988;Essick, Dolan, Turvey, Kelly, & Whitsel, 1990;Essick, Whitsel, Dolan, & Kelly, 1989). The richness of the percept is hypothesized to reflect, in part, the complexity of the stimulation. For example, a moving brush stimulus not only translates across but also laterally stretches the skin. The two mechanical actions (translation and stretch) generate unique stresses and strains, to which peripheral neural encoding mechanisms are differentially sensitive (Edin, Essick, Trulsson, & Olsson, 1995). To better understand tactile motion perception, we studied the percepts evoked by stimuli that elicit response patterns in the cutaneous mechanoreceptors that are much simpler than those elicited by a natural moving stimulus (see Essick, Rath, Kelly, James, & Murray, 1996). These stimuli were generated by a dense-array tactile stimulator that consisted of a matrix of independently controlled probes, each of which vibrated a small area of skin. With this device, a stimulus tha...