To a certain extent, many curriculum reforms that have been introduced in Lesotho schools have been unsuccessful. Teachers’ preparedness to implement these reforms has been the major factor for the failures. Involving teacher education providers in the preparation of teacher preparedness could improve the success rate of these school reforms. Therefore, understanding how education educators prepare teachers for curriculum reforms could assist to understand why school teachers often appear to be ill-prepared for curriculum reforms. Accordingly, this paper investigated the views of six teacher educators about their role in the preparation of teachers for curriculum reforms in Lesotho schools. A questionnaire was used to collect data that were analysed thematically. The results obtained indicate that: teacher educators are involved in a limited way in Lesotho curriculum reforms; and they have limited knowledge about the current reforms. As a result, their training practices do not target to prepare teachers for the reforms introduced in schools. This explains why many studies have found teachers to be ill-prepared for any curriculum reforms in Lesotho. These findings raise awareness on the issue that teacher educators should be involved in the reforms in Lesotho. Therefore, the main recommendation of this study is to engage teacher education providers so as to make the reforms successful.
While the Examination Council of Lesotho (ECOL) is burdened with a huge workload of assessment tasks, their procedures for developing tests, analysing items, and compiling scores heavily rely on the classical test theory (CTT) measurement framework. The CTT has been criticised for its flaws, including being test-oriented, sample dependent, and assuming linear relationships between latent variables and observed scores. This article presents an overview of CTT and item response theory (IRT) and how they were applied to standard assessment questions in the ECOL. These theories have addressed measurement issues associated with commonly used assessments, such as multiple-choice, short response, and constructed response tests. Based on three search facets (Item response theory, classical test theory, and examination council of Lesotho), a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases (such as Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed). The paper was theoretically developed using the electronic databases, keywords, and references identified in the articles. Furthermore, the authors ensure that the keywords are used to identify relevant documents in a wide variety of sources. A general remark was made on the effective application of each model in practice with respect to test development and psychometric activities. In conclusion, the study recommends that ECOL switch from CTT to modern test theory for test development and item analysis, which offers multiple benefits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.