Aim: Evaluate factors associated with pain and analgesic consumption following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Materials and methods:The sample consisted of 218 patients with chronic periodontitis, submitted to non-surgical scaling and root planing under local anaesthesia at a public dental service in southern Brazil. The data collection instruments included a demographic questionnaire, as well as State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Corahʼs Dental Anxiety Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, Numerical Rating Scale and Verbal Rating Scale.The presence and intensity of pain were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hr after scaling and root planing.Results: A total of 52.3% of the patients reported mild intensity pain at some point during the 48 hr after scaling and root planing with local anaesthesia. Smoking (PR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.16-1.65), severe periodontal inflammation (PR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.09-1.58) and dental anxiety (PR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.03-1.49) were associated with postoperative pain after adjusting for age, gender and state and trait anxiety scores. Moreover, 46.8% of the subjects used analgesics at some time during the 48-hr follow-up period and dental anxiety was the only factor associated with postoperative analgesic use. Conclusions:Smoking, severe periodontal inflammation and dental anxiety were identified as factors associated with pain after non-surgical scaling and root planing with local anaesthesia. Dental anxiety was also a factor associated with postoperative analgesic use.

Background: Malnutrition and poor oral health are common conditions in patients in the hospital. Both conditions are associated with poor systemic health. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between the oral condition and the nutrition status of individuals admitted to a large tertiary hospital.Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 364 patients who received a comprehensive dental examination at their hospital bed. An examiner recorded visible plaque index, gingival bleeding index, plaque retentive factors, probing depth, clinical attachment loss, bleeding on probing, number of existing teeth, and prosthesis use. Medical status was assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. The nutrition status was evaluated by the Subjective Global Assessment. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated by Poisson regression analysis with robust variance. Results: Patients with moderate to severe malnutrition presented worse oral hygiene (55.83 ± 25.16 vs 64.90 ± 24.28; P < 0.001), more gingival inflammation (24.31 ± 24.13 vs 33.43 ± 27.36; P < 0.001), higher levels of attachment loss (4.22 ± 1.81 vs 4.80 ± 1.83; P < 0.001), and a lower mean number of teeth (14.58 ± 7.45 vs 10.94 ± 6.85; P < 0.001) than patients without malnutrition. In the multivariable analysis, the number of teeth and higher comorbidity index were associated with malnutrition. Conclusions: Poor oral health and medical condition were associated with malnutrition in this single-institution study, and oral condition may be considered an indicator of malnutrition in patients in the hospital. The implications of this study include the need to raise awareness among health professionals of the importance of oral health and nutrition status in adults.