Sieving coefficients reported in dialyzer data sheets and instructions for use (IFUs) indicate the potential of different solutes to pass across a particular membrane. Despite being measured in vitro, sieving coefficient data are often used as a predictor of the clinical performance of dialyzers. Although standards for the measurement of sieving coefficients exist, the stated methodologies do not offer sufficient guidance to ensure comparability of test results between different dialyzers. The aim of this work was to investigate the relationship between sieving coefficients and published clinical performance indicators for two solutes, albumin loss and beta‐2 microglobulin (β2M) reduction ratio (RR), and to assess the impact of different in vitro test parameters on sieving coefficient values for albumin, β2M, and myoglobin. Clinical albumin loss and β2M RR for commercially available dialyzers used in hemodialysis (HD) and post‐dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) were extracted from the literature and plotted against sieving coefficients reported in data sheets and IFUs. Albumin, β2M, and myoglobin sieving coefficients of a selection of dialyzers were measured per the ISO 8637 standard. The impact of in vitro testing conditions was assessed by changing blood flow rate, ultrafiltration (UF) rate, sampling time, and origin of test plasma. Results showed variation in albumin loss and β2M RR for the same sieving coefficient across different dialyzers in HD and HDF. Changes in blood flow rates, UF rates, sampling time, and test plasma (bovine vs. human) caused marked differences in sieving coefficient values for all investigated solutes. When identical testing conditions were used, sieving coefficient values for the same dialyzer were reproducible. Testing conditions have a marked impact on the measurement of sieving coefficients, and values should not be compared unless identical conditions are used. Further, variability in observed clinical data in part reflects the lack of definition of test conditions.
Recently developed high-flux (HF) dialysis membranes with extended permeability provide better clearance of middle-sized molecules such as interleukins (ILs). Whether this modulation of inflammation influences the procalcific effects of septic plasma on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) is not known. To assess the effects of high cut-off (HCO) and medium cut-off (MCO) membranes on microinflammation and in vitro vascular calcification we developed a miniature dialysis model. Plasma samples from lipopolysaccharide-spiked blood were dialyzed with HF, HCO, and MCO membranes in an in vitro miniature dialysis model. Afterwards, IL-6 concentrations were determined in dialysate and plasma. Calcifying VSMCs were incubated with dialyzed plasma samples and vascular calcification was assessed. Osteopontin (OPN) and matrix Gla protein (MGP) were measured in VSMC supernatants. IL-6 plasma concentrations were markedly lower with HCO and MCO dialysis. VSMC calcification was significantly lower after incubation with MCO- and HCO-serum compared to HF plasma. MGP and OPN levels in supernatants were significantly lower in the MCO but not in the HCO group compared to HF. In vitro dialysis of cytokine-enriched plasma samples with MCO and HCO membranes reduces IL-6 levels. The induction of vascular calcification by cytokine-enriched plasma is reduced after HCO and MCO dialysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.