A B S T R A C T PurposeSentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). Patients and MethodsAt median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically nodenegative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. ResultsOf the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P Ͻ .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P Ͻ .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P Ͻ .0001), higher BMI (P Ͻ .0001), and infection (P Ͻ .0001) or injury (P ϭ .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. ConclusionWhen compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.

A B S T R A C T PurposeSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. This study was undertaken to examine patient perceptions of lymphedema and use of precautionary behaviors several years after axillary surgery. Patients and MethodsNine hundred thirty-six women who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone or SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND) between June 1, 1999, and May 30, 2003, were evaluated at a median of 5 years after surgery. Patient-perceived lymphedema and avoidant behaviors were assessed through interview and administered a validated instrument, and compared with arm measurements. ResultsCurrent arm swelling was reported in 3% of patients who received SLNB alone versus 27% of patients who received SLNB/ALND (P Ͻ .0001), as compared with 5% and 16%, respectively, with measured lymphedema. Only 41% of patients reporting arm swelling had measured lymphedema, and 5% of patients reporting no arm swelling had measured lymphedema. Risk factors associated with reported arm swelling were greater body weight (P Ͻ .0001), higher body mass index (P Ͻ .0001), infection (P Ͻ .0001), and injury (P ϭ .007) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. Patients followed more precautions if they had measured or perceived lymphedema. ConclusionBody weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for perceiving lymphedema. There is significant discordance between the presence of measured and patient-perceived lymphedema. When compared to SLNB/ALND, SLNB-alone results in a significantly lower rate of patientperceived arm swelling 5 years postoperatively, and is perceived by fewer women than are measured to have it. J Clin

Effect of RT on IBTR risk is influenced by both margin width and number of involved ducts at nearest margin. Patients with higher volume of disease near the margin derive a greater benefit from the addition of RT. Despite margins of >or=10 mm, the risk of IBTR remains substantial in patients with DCIS.

BACKGROUND:Multiple clinicopathologic factors have been analyzed for their association with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after women receive breast‐conserving treatment (BCT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The reported incidence of proliferative lesions, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), columnar cell changes (CCC), and lobular neoplasia associated with breast cancer, has been as high as 23%; however, the relevance of these lesions on the natural history of DCIS and the risk of IBTR remains unknown.METHODS:Two hundred ninety‐four patients with DCIS who received BCT between 1991 and 1995 were identified from the authors' institutional database. Slides were reviewed by a dedicated breast pathologist with particular attention to the presence of lobular neoplasia, ADH, and CCC. The actuarial 5‐, 10‐, and 15‐year IBTR rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and were compared using the log‐rank test.RESULTS:Concurrent lobular neoplasia was present in 41 of 294 patients (14%), ADH was present in 37 of 294 patients (13%), and CCC was present in 71 of 294 patients (24%). The median follow‐up was 11 years. IBTR occurred in 40 of 227 patients without lobular neoplasia (18%) versus 15 of 41 patients with lobular neoplasia (37%; P=.005; hazard ratio [HR], 2.49). The 5‐, 10‐, and 15‐year cumulative incidence rates of IBTR were twice as high in women who had DCIS and lobular neoplasia compared with women who had DCIS alone (P=.002). Concomitant ADH (HR, 1.53) and CCC (HR, 1.24) were not associated significantly with IBTR (P=.20 and P=.44, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:Concurrent lobular neoplasia is associated with a significantly higher risk of IBTR in women with DCIS who received BCT. Women with coexisting DCIS and lobular neoplasia who receive BCT should consider using additional risk‐reducing strategies. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.