Summary Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐specific CD8+ cell response restoration during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment could lead to off‐treatment HBV control in e‐antigen‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHBe(−)). Aim To predict this response with variables involved in T‐cell exhaustion for use as a treatment stopping tool. Methods In NUC‐treated CHBe(−) patients, we considered a functional response in cases with HBV‐specific CD8+ cells against core and polymerase HBV epitopes able to proliferate and secrete type I cytokines after antigen encounter. We performed a logistic regression model (LRM) to predict the likelihood of developing this response, based on patient age (subrogate of infection length), HBsAg level, NUC therapy starting point and duration (antigenic pressure). We discontinued treatment and assessed HBV DNA dynamics, HBsAg decline and loss during off‐treatment follow‐up according to LRM likelihood. Results We developed an LRM that predicted the presence of a proliferative type I cytokine‐secreting CD8+ cell response, which correlated positively with treatment duration and negatively with treatment initiation after the age of 40 years and with age adjusted by HBsAg level. We observed a positive correlation between LRM probability and intensity of proliferation, number of epitopes with the functional proliferating response and type I cytokine secretion level. Off‐treatment, HBsAg loss, HBsAg decline >50% and HBV control were more frequent in the group with >90% LRM probability. Conclusions Short‐term low‐level antigen exposure and early long‐term NUC treatment influence the restoration of a functional HBV‐specific CD8+ cell response. Based on these predictors, a high likelihood of detecting this response at treatment withdrawal is associated with off‐treatment HBV control and HBsAg decline and loss.

Thirty to fifty percent of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) display an immune class genetic signature. In this type of tumor, HCC-specific CD8 T cells carry out a key role in HCC control. Those potential reactive HCC-specific CD8 T cells recognize either HCC immunogenic neoantigens or aberrantly expressed host’s antigens, but they become progressively exhausted or deleted. These cells express the negative immunoregulatory checkpoint programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) which impairs T cell receptor signaling by blocking the CD28 positive co-stimulatory signal. The pool of CD8 cells sensitive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment is the PD-1dim memory-like precursor pool that gives rise to the effector subset involved in HCC control. Due to the epigenetic imprints that are transmitted to the next generation, the effect of PD-1 blockade is transient, and repeated treatments lead to tumor resistance. During long-lasting disease, besides the TCR signaling impairment, T cells develop other failures that should be also set-up to increase T cell reactivity. Therefore, several PD-1 blockade-based combinatory therapies are currently under investigation such as adding antiangiogenics, anti-TGFβ1, blockade of other negative immune checkpoints, or increasing HCC antigen presentation. The effect of these combinations on CD8+ T cells is discussed in this review.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a challenging global health problem, with nearly one million related deaths per year. Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment suppresses viral replication but does not provide complete cure of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The accepted endpoint for therapy is the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but this is hardly ever achieved. Therefore, indefinite treatment is usually required. Many different studies have evaluated NA therapy discontinuation after several years of NA treatment and before HBsAg loss. The results have indicated that the majority of patients can remain off therapy, with some even reaching HBsAg seroconversion. Fortunately, this strategy has proved to be safe, but it is essential to consider the risk of liver damage and other comorbidities and to ensure a close follow-up of the candidates before considering this strategy. Unanswered questions remain, namely in which patients could this strategy be effective and what is the optimal time point at which to perform it. To solve this enigma, we should keep in mind that the outcome will ultimately depend on the equilibrium between HBV and the host’s immune system. Viral parameters that have been described as good predictors of response in HBeAg(+) cases, have proven useless in HBeAg(-) ones. Since antiviral immunity plays an essential role in the control of HBV infection, we sought to review and explain potential immunological biomarkers to predict safe NA discontinuation in both groups.

No abstract