Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are a popular way to form synergies between public and private partners in order to overcome modern challenges and develop new opportunities. However, recent research suggests that PPPs entail more risks than other projects. In this systematic literature review, we analyze 159 articles published in international journals and identify eight major risk factors in PPPs. We integrate our results into a risk management framework and examine how the risk factors potentially impact PPPs before summarizing risk mitigation strategies. Our findings offer a cross-sectoral perspective and bridge the gap between research and practical implementation. By developing a novel conceptual model we advance the understanding of risks in PPPs and contribute to the theoretical foundations.
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify whether the prior industry experience (IE) or industry leadership experience (ILE) of the head might influence the department's publication output, the ability to acquire external research funds or its entrepreneurial activities (e.g. the commercialization of research results through patents). Design/methodology/approach -The study is based on data from 208 Austrian university departments and combines data from different sources (CVs of the heads of departments, commercial register, funding data and publication data). Findings -The results show a positive relationship between ILE and the patent output of the departments as one indicator for the commercialization of research activities. Low positive effects of IE on the extent of third-party funding were also found. Furthermore, the scientific experience of the head of department has a positive influence on the publication output of the whole department. Practical implications -The findings suggest that the scientific ability of researchers should be key when selecting the head of a department, due to the fact that scientific performance is still essential for most of these units. However, when universities seek to focus more strongly on other, for example, entrepreneurial activities, then additional competencies come into play. As the actual focus of universities is currently subject to change, former IE and ILE will become increasingly more important and the heads of departments will play a decisive role in the transition toward becoming an entrepreneurial university. Therefore, universities are well advised to integrate these experiences in the job specifications and to establish processes that facilitate the change from an industrial to a university job or which allow "double lives" in university and industry. Originality/value -Previous studies have mostly investigated the role of the scientific experience of academic leaders in the research performance of their institution in later decades. This study examines the
Society has changed sustainably and universities have thus faced new requirements. As a result of competition and globalization, education and knowledge management had to be adapted. Universities were forced to establish a modern management system primarily known from the private sector and governments had to reconsider their legal and economic relationship to universities. In recent years, many countries have implemented new rules for their universities. Two of these countries were Austria and Switzerland. But even when they pursued the same goals, they have chosen quite different approaches and as a matter of fact achieved very differing results. The objective of this study was twofold. Firstly, we analyzed the challenges and contradictions when implementing a modern university model. Secondly, we investigated specific characteristics of the university systems of Austria and Switzerland to identify factors that may have impacted the performance and success of the universities. Referring to our first objective, a literature review has revealed severe contradictions between modern university management and the traditional understanding of it. While the traditional scheme has focused mainly on research, teaching is becoming more relevant in the new demand orientated university. Also, the freedom of science and teaching is limited by the strong orientation on goals that have been agreed upon with the government. Further contradictions can be identified in autonomy, budgeting, leadership, hierarchy, and employee participation. To examine the second research aim, we reviewed national and international databases and reports. Our results emphasize the importance of monetary aspects, the student-teacher-ratio, autonomy, and the relevance of the universities' reputation and acceptance within society and politics. Our findings can help to understand the different approaches which have been chosen to cope with global changes in higher education. They might serve as basis for decision-making in higher education policy.
University-industry collaboration has gained in importance and been the subject of much research during recent decades. When it comes to factors that influence the success of collaborations such as these, the literature focuses mainly on resources, objectives, structure, flexibility, political environment or geographic distance. The social and interpersonal facets of these collaborations are often seen only as side aspects. In the course of this study, we reviewed the relevant literature regarding university-industry collaboration and examined the social and interpersonal factors that might influence success. We investigated peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2000 and 2016 in the English language. Our results indicate that communication, trust, commitment and culture are the most relevant factors in this regard and need to be considered carefully. These factors are important at all levels, from ordinary staff members to leadership and management. The participating partners and individuals are well advised to be aware of cultural differences between universities and industry and must handle dissimilarities and challenges adequately, because good social and interpersonal relationships are necessary for a successful partnership.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.