Background: Screw fixation is the most commonly employed fixation strategy for displaced medial epicondyle fractures, but in younger patients with minimal ossification, the fracture fragment may not accommodate a screw. In these situations, Kirschner-wires (K-wire) or suture anchors may be utilized as alternatives. The purposes of this study were to examine the biomechanical properties of medial epicondyle fractures fixed with a screw, K-wires, or suture anchors, to evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of patients 10 years of age or younger treated with these approaches, and to perform a cost-analysis. Methods: Biomechanical assessment: Immature pig forelimbs underwent an osteotomy through the medial epicondyle apophysis, simulating a fracture. These were then fixed with a screw, K-wires or suture anchors. Cyclic elongation (mm), displacement (mm), load to failure (N), and stiffness (N/mm) were assessed. Clinical assessment: a retrospective review was performed of patients 10 years of age or younger with a medial epicondyle fracture fixed with these strategies. Radiographic outcomes, postoperative data and complications were compared. These data were used to perform a cost-analysis of each treatment approach. Results: Biomechanically, screws were stronger (P=0.047) and stiffer (P=0.01) than the other constructs. Clinically, 51 patients met inclusion criteria (screw=27, wires=11, anchor=13). Patients treated with K-wires were younger (P<0.05) and patients treated with screw fixation had a shorter casting duration (P=0.008). Irrespective of treatment strategy, all fractures healed (100%) and only 1 patient in the screw group lost reduction. Clinical outcomes and complications were similar between groups, but the suture anchor group was less likely to require a second surgery for implant removal (P<0.05). This lower reoperation rate led to a cost-saving of 10%. Conclusions: Biomechanically, all 3 approaches provided initial fixation exceeding the forces observed across the elbow joint with routine motion. The screw construct was the strongest and stiffest. Clinically, all 3 strategies were acceptable, with screw fixation offering a shorter casting duration, but greater implant removal need with higher associated costs.

Background: The primary purpose of this analysis was to compare supracondylar humerus fracture (SCHF) treatment patterns at a single quaternary pediatric hospital relative to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) appropriate use treatment recommendation(s). Methods: Among all fractures included in the cohort (n=571), the observed treatment approach was evaluated relative to the AAOS “Appropriate” treatment recommendation(s). The proportion, and corresponding 95% confidence interval, of cases that agreed with the “Appropriate” treatment recommendation was estimated. Demographics and clinical characteristics among cases that were managed in accordance with the “Appropriate,” “May be Appropriate,” or “Rarely Appropriate” were compared. Results: All fractures were treated according to the “Appropriate,” “May be Appropriate,” or “Rarely Appropriate” AAOS treatment guidelines. The observed treatment among fractures included in the cohort agreed with AAOS “Appropriate” recommendations in 92.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6%-94.2%] of the cases. Fracture type differed significantly between patients treated according to AAOS “Appropriate” recommendations compared to those treated according to “May be Appropriate,” or “Rarely Appropriate” recommendation. Conclusions: The treatment approach implemented at a single level 1 trauma center was in concordance with the appropriate use criteria treatment recommendations in a significant majority of cases. Fractures not treated according to “Appopriate” recommendations were primarily type IIA injuries, and were treated with closed reduction and casting instead of the recommended closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Oblique spiral fractures of the distal third of the fibula are commonly encountered in any orthopedic practice. Controversy persists over various fixation methods and their corresponding risks and benefits.

Introduction: Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 12% to 20% of all distal humerus fractures in the pediatric population. When surgery is indicated, fixation may be achieved with either Kirschner-wires or screws. The literature comparing the outcomes of these 2 different fixation methods is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to compare both the complication and union rates of these 2 forms of operative treatment in a multicenter cohort of children with lateral humeral condyle fractures. Methods: This retrospective study was performed across 6 different institutions. Data were retrospectively collected preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the type of initial treatment: K-wire fixation and screw fixation. Statistical comparisons between these 2 cohorts were performed with an alpha of 0.05. Results: There were 762 patients included in this study, 72.6% (n=553) of which were treated with K-wire fixation. The mean duration of immobilization was 5 weeks in both cohorts, and most patients in this study demonstrated radiographic healing by 11 weeks postoperatively, regardless of treatment method. Similar reoperation rates were seen among those treated with K-wires and screws (5.6% vs. 4.3%, P=0.473). Elbow stiffness requiring further intervention with physical therapy was significantly more common in those treated with K-wires compared with children treated with screws (21.2% vs. 13.9%, P=0.023) as was superficial skin infection (3.8% vs. 0%, P=0.002), but there was no significant difference in nonunion rates between the two groups (2.4% vs. 1.3%, P=1.000). Conclusion: We found similar success rates between K-wire and screw fixation in this patient population. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find evidence that treatment with screw fixation decreases the likelihood of experiencing nonunion. However, given the unique complications associated with K-wire fixation, such as elbow stiffness and superficial skin infection, the treatment with screw fixation remains a reasonable alternative to K-wire fixation in these patients. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study

Background: Although current clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons suggest that Type II and III supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures be treated by closed reduction and pin fixation, controversy remains as to whether type IIa fractures with no rotation or angular deformity require surgery. The purpose of our study was to prospectively compare radiographic and functional outcomes of type IIa SCH fractures treated with or without surgery. Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, 105 patients between 2 and 12 years of age presenting with type IIa SCH fractures and without prior elbow trauma, neuromuscular or metabolic conditions, were prospectively enrolled. Ten orthopaedic surgeons managed the patients with 5 preferring surgical treatment and 5 preferring an initial attempt at nonoperative treatment. Patients in the nonoperative cohort were managed with a long-arm cast and close radiographic follow-up. Patients underwent a standardized protocol, including 3 to 4 weeks of casting, bilateral radiographic follow-up 6 months postinjury, and telephone follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: Ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria (45 nonoperative and 54 operatives). Of the nonoperative patients, 4 (9%) were converted to surgery up to their first clinical follow-up. No differences were identified between the cohorts with respect to demographic data, but patients undergoing surgery had on average 6 degrees more posterior angulation at the fracture site preoperatively (P<0.05). At the final clinical follow-up (mean=6 mo), the nonoperative group had more radiographic extension (176.9 vs 174.4 degrees, P=0.04) as measured by the hourglass angle, but no other clinical or radiographic differences were appreciated. Complications were similar between the nonoperative and operative groups: refracture (4.4 vs 5.6%), avascular necrosis (2.2 vs 1.9%) and infection (0 vs 1.9%) (P>0.05). Patient-reported outcomes at a mean of 24 months showed no differences between groups. Conclusion: Contrary to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines, about 90% of patients with type IIa supracondylar fractures can be treated nonoperatively and will achieve good radiographic and functional outcomes with mild residual deformity improving over time. Patients treated nonoperatively must be monitored closely to assess for early loss of reduction and the need for surgical intervention.