Neonatal screening for congenital primary hypothyroidism (CH) is mandatory in Germany but medical care thereafter remains inconsistent. Therefore, the registry HypoDok of the German Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (DGKED) was analyzed to evaluate the implementation of evidence-based guidelines and to assess the number of included patients. Inclusion criteria were (i) date of birth between 10/2001 and 05/2020 and (ii) increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at screening and/or confirmation. The cohort was divided into before (A) and after (B) guideline publication in 02/2011, to assess the guideline’s influence on medical care. A total of 659 patients were analyzed as group A (n = 327) and group B (n = 332) representing 17.5% and 10.3% of CH patients identified in the German and Austrian neonatal screening program during the respective time period. Treatment start and thyroxine doses were similar in both groups and consistent with recommendations. Regular follow-ups were documented. In the first three years of life, less than half of the patients underwent audiometry; developmental assessment was performed in 49.3% (A) and 24.8% (B) (p < 0.01). Documentation of CH patient care by pediatric endocrinologists seemed to be established, however, it reflected only a minority of the affected patients. Therefore, comprehensive documentation as an important instrument of quality assurance and evidence-based medicine should be legally enforced and officially funded in order to record, comprehend, and optimize care and outcome in patients with rare diseases such as CH.
Background: Neonatal screening for congenital primary hypothyroidism (CH) is mandatory in Germany but medical care thereafter remains inconsistent. Therefore, the multicentre database HypoDok was analysed to evaluate the implementation of evidence-based guidelines in the care of children with CH and to assess the number of patients in this registry of the German society of paediatric endocrinology and diabetology (DGKED).Methods: HypoDok includes the prospective documentation of 1,630 patients with CH from 50 centres in Germany and Austria. Inclusion criteria were (i) date of birth between 10/2001 and 05/2020 and (ii) increased TSH at screening and/or confirmation. Parameters regarding diagnosis, therapy and follow-up were extracted. The number of registered patients was compared to the number in the report of the German Society for Neonatal Screening (DGNS). The cohort was divided into 2 groups, before (A) and after (B) guideline publication in 02/2011, to assess guideline’s influence on medical care.Results: 659 patients (62% female) were eligible and analysed as group A (n=327) and group B (n=332) representing 17.5% and 6.7% of CH patients identified in the German and Austrian neonatal screening program during the respective time period. Treatment start and thyroxin doses were similar in both groups and consistent with recommendations. Regular follow-ups were documented in both groups including five appointments in the first and three in the second year of life. Ultrasound of the thyroid gland was performed in 92.6% (A) and 92.1% (B) of the patients. In the first three years of life, 46.4% (A) and 40.0% (B) of the patients underwent audiometry, EQ/IQ testing was performed in 49.3% (A) and 24.8% (B) (p<0.01), respectively.Summary: While documentation of care for patients with CH by paediatric endocrinologists seems to be established, only a minority of all affected patients is included in HypoDok. Thus, the care and outcome of the majority of patients with CH remains uncertain. Therefore, comprehensive documentation as an important instrument of quality assurance and evidence-based medicine should be legally enforced and officially funded in order to record, comprehend and optimize care and outcome in patients with rare diseases such as CH, irrespective of treatment provider.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.