Tonic and phasic respiratory drives to human genioglossus motoneurons during breathing. J Neurophysiol 95: 2213-2221, 2006. First published November 23, 2005 doi:10.1152/jn.00940.2005. A tongue muscle, the genioglossus (GG), is important in maintaining pharyngeal airway patency. Previous recordings of multiunit electromyogram (EMG) suggest it is activated during inspiration in humans with some tonic activity in expiration. We recorded from populations of single motor units in GG in seven subjects during quiet breathing when awake. Ultrasonography assisted electrode placement. The activity of single units was separated into six classes based on a step-wise analysis of the discharge pattern. Phasic and tonic activities were analyzed statistically with the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) between discharge frequency and lung volume. Of the 110 motor units, 29% discharged tonically without phasic respiratory modulation (firing rate ϳ19 Hz). Further, 16% of units increased their discharge during expiration (expiratory phasic and expiratory tonic units). Only half the units increased their discharge during inspiration (inspiratory phasic and inspiratory tonic units). Units firing tonically with an inspiratory increase had significantly higher discharge rates than those units that only fired phasically (peak rates 25 vs. 16 Hz, respectively). Simultaneous recordings of two or three motor units showed neighboring units with differing respiratory and tonic drives. Our results provide a classification and the first quantitative measures of human GG motor-unit behavior and suggest this activity results from a complex interaction of inspiratory, expiratory, and tonic drives at the hypoglossal motor nucleus. The presence of different drives to GG implies that complex premotor networks can differentially engage human hypoglossal motoneurons during respiration. This is unlike the ordered recruitment of motor units in limb and axial muscles.
Central control of inspiratory motoneuron output differs from that of tonic and expiratory units during sleep onset, suggesting that the maintenance of airway patency during sleep may become more reliant on the stiffening properties of tonic and expiratory modulated motor units.
One postulated mechanism for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is insufficient drive to the upper-airway musculature during sleep, with increased (compensatory) drive during wakefulness. This generates more electromyographic activity in upper airway muscles including genioglossus. To understand drives to upper airway muscles, we recorded single motor unit activity from genioglossus in male groups of control (n = 7, 7 ± 2 events h −1 ) and severe OSA (n = 9, 54 ± 4 events h −1 ) subjects. One hundred and seventy-eight genioglossus units were recorded using monopolar electrodes. Subjects were awake, supine and breathing through a nasal mask. The distribution of the six types of motor unit activity in genioglossus (Inspiratory Phasic, Inspiratory Tonic, Expiratory Phasic, Expiratory Tonic, Tonic and Tonic Other) was identical in both groups. Single unit action potentials in OSA were larger in area (by 34%, P < 0.05) and longer in duration (by 23%, P < 0.05). Inspiratory units were recruited earlier in OSA than control subjects. In control subjects, Inspiratory Tonic units peaked earlier than Inspiratory Phasic units, while in OSA subjects, Inspiratory Tonic and Phasic units peaked simultaneously. Onset frequencies did not differ between groups, but the peak discharge frequency for Inspiratory Phasic units was higher in OSA (22 ± 1 Hz) than control subjects (19 ± 1 Hz, P = 0.003), but conversely, the peak discharge frequency of Inspiratory Tonic units was higher in control subjects (28 ± 1 Hz versus 25 ± 1 Hz, P < 0.05). Increased motor unit action potential area indicates that neurogenic changes have occurred in OSA. In addition, the differences in the timing and firing frequency of the inspiratory classes of genioglossus motor units indicate that the output of the hypoglossal nucleus may have changed.
A growing literature supports a role for sleep after training in long-term memory consolidation and enhancement. Consequently, interrupted sleep should result in cognitive deficits. Recent evidence from an animal study indeed showed that optimal memory consolidation during sleep requires a certain amount of uninterrupted sleep. Sleep continuity is disrupted in various medical disorders. We compared performance on a motor sequence learning task (MST) in relatively young subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (n = 16; apnea-hypopnea index 17.1±2.6/h [SEM]) to a carefully matched control group (n = 15, apnea-hypopnea index 3.7±0.4/h, p<0.001. Apart from AHI, oxygen nadir and arousal index, there were no significant differences between groups in total sleep time, sleep efficiency and sleep architecture as well as subjective measures of sleepiness based on standard questionnaires. In addition performance on the psychomotor vigilance task (reaction time and lapses), which is highly sensitive to sleep deprivation showed no differences as well as initial learning performance during the training phase. However there was a significant difference in the primary outcome of immediate overnight improvement on the MST between the two groups (controls = 14.7±4%, patients = 1.1±3.6%; P = 0.023) as well as plateau performance (controls = 24.0±5.3%, patients = 10.1±2.0%; P = 0.017) and this difference was predicted by the arousal index (p = 0.02) rather than oxygen saturation (nadir and time below 90% saturation. Taken together, this outcome provides evidence that there is a clear minimum requirement of sleep continuity in humans to ensure optimal sleep dependent memory processes. It also provides important new information about the cognitive impact of obstructive sleep apnea and challenges its current definitions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.