Elevated levels of methaemoglobin, the ferric form of haemoglobin incapable of oxygen transport, have been previously found during Plasmodium vivax infections and in acidotic infants. We measured methaemoglobin in the following 5 groups of children with P. falciparum malaria admitted to Muhimbili Medical Centre, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. (i) Cerebral malaria (CM) with unrousable coma (n = 50), including 32 with complete recovery (CMCR) and 18 with death or neurological sequelae (CMDS); (ii) malaria with severe anaemia but without severe respiratory distress (SA; n = 6); (iii) uncomplicated malaria (UM; n = 37); (iv) asymptomatic parasitaemia (AP; n = 5); and (v) healthy controls (HC; n = 34). Mean methaemoglobin levels were elevated in all groups with malaria, forming up to 16.4% of circulating haemoglobin. The degree of methaemoglobinaemia correlated with disease severity and severity of anaemia. Mean methaemoglobin levels in children with AP, UM, SA, CMCR and CMDS were 3.3%, 4.1%, 5.6%, 4.7% and 5.8% respectively; the mean levels in those with clinical disease were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (2.0%). Methaemoglobinaemia > 10% was found in 5.4%, 16.7%, 12.5%, and 22.2% of those with UM, SA, CMCR and CMDS, respectively. In the presence of parasite sequestration, impaired tissue perfusion, and a reduction in oxygen carrying capacity of blood due to anaemia, a further reduction in oxygen carrying capacity from even a modest concentration of methaemoglobin is likely to exacerbate tissue hypoxia, perhaps critically so in a minority of anaemic and acidotic patients with severe falciparum malaria.

In Tanzania, there is paucity of data for monitoring laboratory medicine including haematology. This therefore calls for audits of practices in haematology and blood transfusion in order to provide appraise practice and devise strategies that would result in improved quality of health care services.  This descriptive cross-sectional study which audited laboratory practice in haematology and blood transfusion at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) aimed at assessing the  pre-analytical stage of laboratory investigations including laboratory request forms and handling specimen processing in the haematology laboratory and assessing the chain from donor selection, blood component processing  to administration of blood during transfusion. A national standard checklist was used to audit the laboratory request forms (LRF), phlebotomists’ practices on handling and assessing the from donor selection to administration of blood during transfusion. Both interview and observations were used. A total of 195 LRF were audited and 100% of had incomplete information such as patients’ identification numbers, time sample ordered, reason for request, summary of clinical assessment and differential diagnoses. The labelling of specimens was poorly done by phlebotomists/clinicians in 82% of the specimens. Also 65% (132/202) of the blood samples delivered in the haematology laboratory did not contain the recommended volume of blood. There was no laboratory request form specific for ordering blood and there were no guidelines for indication of blood transfusion in the wards/clinics. The blood transfusion laboratory section was not participating in external quality assessment and the hospital transfusion committee was not in operation. It is recommended that a referral hospital like MNH should have a transfusion committee to provide an active forum to facilitate communication between those involved with transfusion, monitor, coordinate and audit blood transfusion practices as per national guidelines.