Anaerobic biological secondary treatment
has the potential to substantially
reduce the energy cost and footprint of wastewater treatment. However,
for utilities seeking to meet future water demand through potable
reuse, the compatibility of anaerobically treated secondary effluent
with potable reuse trains has not been evaluated. This study characterized
the effects of different combinations of chloramines, ozone, and biological
activated carbon (BAC), applied as pretreatments to mitigate organic
chemical fouling of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes, and the production
of 43 disinfection byproducts (DBPs). The study employed effluent
from a pilot-scale anaerobic reactor and soluble microbial products
(SMPs) generated from a synthetic wastewater. Ozonation alone minimized
RO flux decline by rendering the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) more
hydrophilic. When combined with chloramination, ozone addition after
chloramines maintained a higher RO flux. BAC treatment was ineffective
for reducing the pressure and energy requirements for a set permeate
flux. Regardless of pretreatment method prior to RO, the total DBP
concentrations were <14 μg/L upstream of RO. After treatment
by RO, the UV/hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation process, and chloramination,
the total DBP concentrations were ≤5 μg/L. When DBP concentrations
were weighted by metrics of toxic potency, the total DBP calculated
toxicity was 4-fold lower than observed previously in full-scale potable
reuse facilities receiving aerobically treated secondary effluent.
The RO fouling and DBP formation behavior of anaerobic SMPs were similar
to that of the pilot-scale anaerobic effluent. The results of this
study are promising, but more research is needed to evaluate whether
anaerobic effluent is suitable as an influent to potable reuse trains.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.