TTF-1 expression was evaluable in 479 (75%) of all patients reviewed, and was positive in 383 (80%, 95% CI 76-83%). Clinicopathologic features were similar between TTF-1 positive and TTF-1 negative tumors, except EGFR mutations were more common in TTF-1 positive cases (24% vs 6%, p<0.001). In univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly longer in patients with TTF-1 positive versus TTF-1 negative tumors (18 months vs 9 months, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, TTF-1 positivity remained associated with better overall survival (HR=0.38, p<0.0001), exceeding the prognostic impact of Karnofsky performance status >/=80% (HR 0.62, p=0.0003) and receipt of first-line combination chemotherapy or targeted therapy (HR relative to first-line single agent chemotherapy 0.59, p=0.05 and 0.51, p=0.05 respectively). Both patients with TTF-1 positive and TTF-1 negative cancers had longer durations of initial therapy when treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. In patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas, TTF-1 expression is associated with better survival but is not predictive of distinct benefit from pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.
Purpose-To investigate the value of T2-radiomics combined with anatomical MRI staging criteria from pre-treatment rectal MRI in predicting complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT).Methods-This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent rectal MRI before neoadjuvant CRT from October 2011-January 2015 and then Terms of use and reuse: academic research for non-commercial purposes, see here for full terms. https://www.springer.com/aamterms-v1
Purpose-To compare the sensitivity, specificity and intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) b800 and b1500 s/mm 2 sequences in the detection of residual adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).Introduction-Detection of residual adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant CRT for LARC has become increasingly important and relies on both MRI and endoscopic surveillance. Optimal MRI diffusion b values have yet to be established for this clinical purpose.Methods-From our MRI database between 2018 and 2019, we identified a cohort of 28 patients after exclusions who underwent MRI of the rectum before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation with a protocol that included both b800 and b1500 s/mm 2 diffusion sequences. Four radiologists experienced in rectal MRI interpreted the post-CRT MRI studies with either b800 DWI or b1500 DWI, and a minimum of 2 weeks later re-interpreted the same studies using the other b value sequence. Surgical pathology or endoscopic follow-up for 1 year without tumor re-growth was used as the reference standard. Descriptive statistics compared accuracy for each reader and for all readers combined between b values. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.Results-Within the cohort, 19/28 (67.9%) had residual tumor, while 9/28 (32.1%) had a complete response. Among four readers, one reader had increased sensitivity for detection of residual tumor at b1500 s/mm 2 (0.737 vs. 0.526, p = 0.046). There was no significant difference between detection of residual tumor at b800 and at b1500 for the rest of the readers. With all readers combined, the pooled sensitivity was 0.724 at b1500 versus 0.605 at b800, but this was not significant (p = 0.119). There was no difference in agreement between readers at the two b value settings (67.8% at b800 vs. 72.0% at b1500), or for any combination of individual readers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.