No abstract

Background and ObjectiveDelirium represents the most common form of acute cerebral dysfunction in critical illness. The prevention, recognition, and treatment of delirium must become the focus of modern pediatric intensive care, as delirium can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a delirium bundle consisting of mainly non-pharmacological measures.Material and MethodsThis is a pre-/post-implementation study in an interdisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care university hospital. In the pre-implementation period, pediatric intensive care delirium was monitored using the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms and Pediatric Delirium scale. After introduction of a delirium bundle consisting of non-pharmacological prevention and treatment measures a period of 4 months was interposed to train the PICU staff and ensure that the delirium bundle was implemented consistently before evaluating the effects in the post-implementation period. Data collection included prevalence of delirium and withdrawal, length of PICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative dose of sedatives and analgesics.ResultsA total of 792 critically ill children aged 0–18 years were included in this study. An overall delirium prevalence of 30% was recorded in the pre-implementation group and 26% in the post-implementation group (p = 0.13). A significant reduction in the prevalence of pediatric delirium from was achieved in the subgroup of patients under 5 years of age (27.9 vs. 35.8%, p = 0.04) and in patients after surgery for congenital heart disease (28.2 vs. 39.5%, p = 0.04). Young age, length of PICU stay, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome were found to be risk factors for developing delirium.ConclusionsBased on a validated delirium monitoring, our study gives new information regarding the prevalence of pediatric delirium and the characteristics of intensive care patients at risk for this significant complication. Especially young patients and patients after surgery for congenital heart disease seem to benefit from the implementation of non-pharmacological delirium bundles. Based on our findings, it is important to promote change in pediatric intensive care—toward a comprehensive approach to prevent delirium in critically ill children as best as possible.

No abstract

Background and SignificanceAdvances in pediatric intensive care have led to markedly improved survival rates in critically ill children. Approximately 70% of those children survive with varying forms of complex chronic diseases or impairment/disabilities. Length of stay, length of mechanical ventilation and number of interventions per patient are increasing with rising complexity of underlying diseases, leading to increasing pain, agitation, withdrawal symptoms, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption. The ICU-Liberation Collaborative of the Society of Critical Care Medicine has developed a number of preventative measures for prevention, early detection, or treatment of physical and psychiatric/psychological sequelae of oftentimes traumatic intensive care medicine. These so called ABCDEF-Bundles consist of elements for (A) assessment, prevention and management of pain, (B) spontaneous awakening and breathing trials (SAT/SBT), (C) choice of analgesia and sedation, (D) assessment, prevention and management of delirium, (E) early mobility and exercise and (F) family engagement and empowerment. For adult patients in critical care medicine, research shows significant effects of bundle-implementation on survival, mechanical ventilation, coma, delirium and post-ICU discharge disposition. Research regarding PICS in children and possible preventative or therapeutic intervention is insufficient as yet. This narrative review provides available information for modification and further research on the ABCDEF-Bundles for use in critically ill children.Material and MethodsA narrative review of existing literature was used.ResultsOne obvious distinction to adult patients is the wide range of different developmental stages of children and the even closer relationship between patient and family. Evidence for pediatric ABCDEF-Bundles is insufficient and input can only be collected from literature regarding different subsections and topics.ConclusionIn addition to efforts to improve analgesia, sedation and weaning protocols with the aim of prevention, early detection and effective treatment of withdrawal symptoms or delirium, efforts are focused on adjusting ABCDEF bundle for the entire pediatric age group and on strengthening families' decision-making power, understanding parents as a resource for their child and involving them early in the care of their children.

AVWS (acquired von Willebrand syndrome) has been reported in patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD) associated with shear stress caused by significant blood flow gradients. Its etiology and impact on intraoperative bleeding during pediatric cardiac surgery have not been systematically studied. This single-center, prospective, observational study investigated appropriate diagnostic tools of aVWS compared to multimer analysis as diagnostic gold standard and aimed to clarify the role of aVWS in intraoperative hemorrhage. A total of 65 newborns and infants aged 0-12 months scheduled for cardiac surgery at our tertiary referral center during 03/18 to 07/19 were included in the analysis. The GPIbM/VWF:Ag ratio provided the best predictability of aVWS (area under the curve (AUC) 0.81[0.75-0.86]), followed by VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratio (AUC 0.70[0.63-0.77]) and peak systolic echocardiographic gradients (AUC 0.69[0.62-0.76]). A cutoff value of 0.83 was proposed for the GPIbM/VWF:Ag ratio. Intraoperative high molecular weight multimer (HMWM) ratios were inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (r=-0.57) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) time (r=-0.54). Patients with intraoperative aVWS received significantly more fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (p=0.016) and fibrinogen concentrate (FIB) (p=0.011) compared to those without. The amounts of other administered blood components and chest closure times did not differ significantly. CPB appears to trigger aVWS in pediatric cardiac surgery. The GPIbM/VWF:Ag ratio is a reliable test that can be included in routine intraoperative laboratory workup. Our data provide the basis for further studies in larger patient cohorts to achieve definitive clarification of the effects of aVWS and its potential treatment on intraoperative bleeding.