The current study employed a life events perspective to examine the relationship between attachment style and both adjustment and coping processes in adults during two specific life events involving both the loss of and a renegotiation of an attachment relationship: the launching of children from the family of origin and job loss, which represent both normative and non-normative transitions, respectively. Using median splits for each attachment dimension (closeness, dependency, and anxiety) to define secure, anxious, and avoidant styles, based on the work of Collins and Read, analyses failed to yield a significant multivariate life event by style interaction. However, a statistically significant multivariate main effect for life event and for attachment style was obtained. Additionally, findings suggested that to a certain extent, the impact of attachment style and life events is moderated by gender, wherein a supplemental analysis yielded a significant life event by gender by level of closeness interaction. The data support the notion that securely attached individuals may be more equipped to meet developmental life challenges in adulthood, and extend previous work that is limited to women and to the empty nest.

No abstract

Based on data collected from two separate samples of older adults, the present study explored the role of cortisol in mediating practice-related gains in fluid intelligence (Gf) among older adults. Analyses across samples involved treatment group participants who received stress inoculation training in order to reduce anxiety concerning intellectual performance; waiting list control group participants did not receive training until the experiment(s) were completed. Practice effects were examined for both groups. In Study 1, the sample consisted of a heterogeneous (re: concerns about intellectual performance) group of older adults, and Study 2 participants were older adults who self-reported as being at least moderately anxious or concerned about intellectual performance declines. The two samples differed on health (p < .01), with Study 2 participants being healthier (as determined via self-report). Results indicated that practice, but not training, effects were evident for measures of crystallized ability (Gc) and Gf across both studies. The data also suggested that cortisol mediation was different for the two samples in that it was negatively correlated with Gf in the first sample, and, though not significant, positively correlated with Gf in the second. The same directional relationships were evident for the measure of Gc. Comparisons between studies regarding correlations between cortisol and practice-related gains in performance were significant for Gf (p < .01) and approached significance for Gc (p < .07). These data seem to suggest that for some older persons, higher levels of cortisol interfere with the effects of practice on Gf performance, while for others, higher cortisol facilitates such gains in performance.