Rhabdomyolysis can be life threatening if complicated by AKI. Macrophage infiltration has been observed in rat kidneys after glycerol-induced rhabdomyolysis, but the role of macrophages in rhabdomyolysisinduced AKI remains unknown. Here, in a patient diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis, we detected substantial macrophage infiltration in the kidney. In a mouse model of rhabdomyolysis-induced AKI, diverse renal macrophage phenotypes were observed depending on the stage of the disease. rophages. Furthermore, transcriptionally regulated targets potentially involved in disease progression, including fibronectin, collagen III, and chemoattractants that were identified via single-cell analysis, were verified as macrophage-dependent in situ. In vitro, myoglobin treatment induced proximal tubular cells to secrete chemoattractants and macrophages to express proinflammatory markers. At day 30, liposomal clodronate-mediated macrophage depletion reduced fibrosis and improved both kidney repair and mouse survival. Seven months after rhabdomyolysis, histologic lesions were still present but were substantially reduced with prior depletion of macrophages. These results suggest an important role for macrophages in rhabdomyolysisinduced AKI progression and advocate the utility of long-term follow-up for patients with this disease.

AIMTo investigate the role of tacrolimus intra-patient variability (IPV) in adult liver-transplant recipients.METHODSWe retrospectively assessed tacrolimus variability in a cohort of liver-transplant recipients and analyzed its effect on the occurrence of graft rejection and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), as well as graft survival during the first 2 years posttransplantation. Between 02/08 and 06/2015, 116 patients that received tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (with or without steroids) were included.RESULTSTwenty-two patients (18.5%) experienced at least one acute-rejection episode (BPAR). Predictive factors for a BPAR were a tacrolimus IPV of > 35% [OR = 3.07 95%CI (1.14-8.24), P = 0.03] or > 40% [OR = 4.16 (1.38-12.50), P = 0.01), and a tacrolimus trough level of < 5 ng/mL [OR=3.68 (1.3-10.4), P =0.014]. Thirteen patients (11.2%) developed at least one dnDSA during the follow-up. Tacrolimus IPV [coded as a continuous variable: OR = 1.1, 95%CI (1.0-1.12), P = 0.006] of > 35% [OR = 4.83, 95%CI (1.39-16.72), P = 0.01] and > 40% [OR = 9.73, 95%CI (2.65-35.76), P = 0.001] were identified as predictors to detect dnDSAs. IPV did not impact on patient- or graft-survival rates during the follow-up.CONCLUSIONTacrolimus-IPV could be a useful tool to identify patients with a greater risk of graft rejection and of developing a de novo DSA after liver transplantation

Background:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA-4) are increasingly used in various cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-related renal disorders are poorly described (9 cases) and were only related to Ipilimumab.Methods:Retrospective collection of clinical charts of all the patients admitted for renal disorders following ICI in the University Hospital of Toulouse (France).Results:We report on adverse renal events that occurred in three patients treated with anti-PD1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab). Acute kidney injury occurred at 4–12 weeks after initiation of treatment, and harbored features of tubulo-interstitial nephritis (interstitial polymorphic inflammatory infiltrate with predominant CD3+ CD4+ T cells, associated with granuloma in one). Following withdrawal of ICI and steroid intake, estimated glomerular-filtration rate had improved in all patients.Conclusions:These data suggest that all ICI can lead to acute interstitial nephritis, possibly related to the presence of autoreactive clonal T cells. We recommend that patients receiving ICI should undergo renal monitoring every 2 weeks for 3–6 months.

The immunogenicity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccine was improved by the administration of a third dose. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the evolution of binding and neutralizing antibody concentration until 3 months after the third dose in a large cohort of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients (n = 872). At 1 month after the third dose, anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies were detected by means of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay tests in 578 patients (66.3%). In a subgroup of patients, 70% (180 out of 257) had anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 18 411 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml and 48.5% (115 out of 239) had a neutralizing antibodies titer that can confer clinical protection against SARS‐CoV‐2. Three‐hundred ninety‐three patients out of the 416 (94.5%) who were seropositive at month 1 and were tested at 3 months after vaccination remained seropositive. Between months 1 and 3 after vaccination, binding and neutralizing antibodies concentrations decreased significantly. The proportion of protected patients against the SARS‐CoV‐2 also slightly decreased. In conclusion, this study shows that although two‐third of SOT develop anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies after three doses, one‐third of them remain weak or non‐protected. It is important to measure anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies to define the strategy that can optimize SOT protection against SARS‐CoV‐2.