Growth hormone (GH) has a positive impact on muscle mass, growth and bone formation. It is known to interact with the bone-forming unit, with well-documented increases in markers of bone formation and bone resorption within weeks of the start of GH therapy. These changes relate significantly to short-term growth rate, but it is not evident that they predict long-term response to GH therapy. The consequences of GH deficiency (GHD) and GH replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) have been difficult to interpret in children because of the dependency of areal BMD on height and weight. Some studies have tried to overcome this problem by calculating volumetric BMD, but results are conflicting. The attainment of a normal peak bone mass in an individual is considered important for the future prevention of osteoporosis. From the limited data available, it appears difficult to normalize bone mass totally in GH-deficient individuals, despite GH treatment for long periods. Studies to date examining the interaction between GH and bone have included only small numbers of individuals, making it difficult to interpret the study findings. It is hoped that these issues can be clarified in future research by the direct measurement of bone density (using quantitative computer tomography). Mineralization is only one facet of bone strength, however; other important components (e.g. bone structure and geometry) should be addressed in future paediatric studies. Future studies could also address the importance of the degree of GHD in childhood; how GH dose and insulin-like growth factor-I levels achieved during therapy relate to the final outcome; whether or not the continuation of GH therapy after the attainment of final height may further enhance bone mass; whether the timing and dose of other treatments (e.g. sex hormone replacement therapy) are critical to the outcome; and whether GHD in childhood is associated with an increased risk of fracture.

Growth hormone (GH) has a positive impact on muscle mass, growth and bone formation. It is known to interact with the bone-forming unit, with well-documented increases in markers of bone formation and bone resorption within weeks of the start of GH therapy. These changes relate significantly to short-term growth rate, but it is not evident that they predict long-term response to GH therapy. The consequences of GH deficiency (GHD) and GH replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) have been difficult to interpret in children because of the dependency of areal BMD on height and weight. Some studies have tried to overcome this problem by calculating volumetric BMD, but results are conflicting. The attainment of a normal peak bone mass in an individual is considered important for the future prevention of osteoporosis. From the limited data available, it appears difficult to normalize bone mass totally in GH-deficient individuals, despite GH treatment for long periods. Studies to date examining the interaction between GH and bone have included only small numbers of individuals, making it difficult to interpret the study findings. It is hoped that these issues can be clarified in future research by the direct measurement of bone density (using quantitative computer tomography). Mineralization is only one facet of bone strength, however; other important components (e.g. bone structure and geometry) should be addressed in future paediatric studies. Future studies could also address the importance of the degree of GHD in childhood; how GH dose and insulin-like growth factor-I levels achieved during therapy relate to the final outcome; whether or not the continuation of GH therapy after the attainment of final height may further enhance bone mass; whether the timing and dose of other treatments (e.g. sex hormone replacement therapy) are critical to the outcome; and whether GHD in childhood is associated with an increased risk of fracture.