BackgroundHospitalised patients whose inpatient teams rotate off service experience increased mortality related to end-of-rotation care transitions, yet standardised handoff practices are lacking.ObjectiveDevelop and implement a multidisciplinary patient-centred handoff intervention to improve outcomes for patients who are critically ill during end-of-rotation transitions.Design, setting and participantsSingle-centre, controlled pilot study of medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose resident team was undergoing end-of-rotation transition at a university hospital from June 2017 to February 2018.InterventionA 4-item intervention was implemented over two study periods. Intervention 1 included: (1) in-person bedside handoff between teams rotating off and on service, (2) handoff checklist, (3) nursing involvement in handoff, and (4) 30 min education session. Intervention 2 included the additional option to conduct bedside handoff via videoconferencing.Main outcome measuresImplementation was measured by repeated clinician surveys and direct observation. Patient outcomes included length of stay (LOS; ICU and hospital) and mortality (ICU, hospital and 30 days). Clinician perceptions were modelled over time using per cent positive responses in logistic regression. Patient outcomes were compared with matched control ‘transition’ patients from 1 year prior to implementation of the intervention.ResultsAmong 270 transition patients, 46.3% were female with a mean age of 55.9 years. Mechanical ventilation (64.1%) and in-hospital death (27.6%) rates were prevalent. Despite high implementation rates—handoff participation (93.8%), checklist utilisation (75.0%), videoconferencing (62.5%), nursing involvement (75.0%)—the intervention did not significantly improve LOS or mortality. Multidisciplinary survey data revealed significant improvement in acceptability by nursing staff, while satisfaction significantly declined for resident physicians.ConclusionsIn this controlled pilot study, a structured ICU end-of-rotation care transition strategy was feasible to implement with high fidelity. While mortality and LOS were not affected in a pilot study with limited power, the pragmatic strategy of this intervention holds promise for future trials.

Introduction: Mounting evidence indicates that early life trauma is highly prevalent and associated with adverse health outcomes later in life. However, primary care providers report lacking the training to effectively address trauma encountered in daily practice. There is a paucity of research describing the implementation and evaluation of trauma-informed care (TIC) curricula within Graduate Medical Education.Methods: We piloted a three-hour TIC workshop facilitated by a community-based psychologist expert to assess the feasibility and impact of TIC training on Internal Medicine (IM) residents' knowledge, attitudes and skills related to TIC. Participants were a subset of IM residents in a health-equity-focused curricular pathway in the University of Colorado IM Residency. Residents completed anonymous surveys one week before and after the workshop, and a final survey 10 weeks later. Residents who did not participate in the workshop completed a similar baseline survey (control group). Data were analyzed using matched pair Ttests.Results: Fourteen of 20 residents (70%) who participated in the pilot workshop completed the initial survey. Of these, 10 (71%) completed the first post-workshop survey, and seven (50%) completed the final survey. We observed significant improvements in residents' self-reported knowledge, attitudes and skills related to TIC. The majority of residents in the control group reported a desire for TIC training.Conclusions: TIC is an important curricular gap in IM training. A single, brief TIC workshop was feasible and was associated with improved self-reported knowledge, attitudes and skills among IM residents.

No abstract

No abstract